“It is common knowledge that all valuable property which belongs to me and my family was seized, as such, it is not possible that I will keep the jewellery worth millions at a time when I was not allowed to travel overseas,” she added.She said the jewellery was given to her for the benefit and profit of the company to attract publicity and credibility among its customers.
According to the statement of claim, the plaintiff alleged that only one of the 44 pieces of jewellery was in police custody.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more: