Utahns have no right against partisan gerrymandering, congressmen tell Supreme Court

  • 📰 sltrib
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 39 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 61%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

In a brief quietly submitted to the Utah Supreme Court and obtained by The Tribune, Utah’s congressmen laid bare what they think about the redistricting process and the lawsuit alleging the rearranged district boundaries disenfranchise Utah voters.

The Utah Supreme Court is scheduled to hear appeals in a lawsuit challenging political maps drawn by the Legislature on July 11.

A group of Utahns and voters’ rights groups also question the potential role those lawmakers had in creating or supporting the latest boundaries, and have gone as far as suing the Legislature and Utah election officials, while also serving theAccording to an attorney representing the complainants, the congressmen refused to cooperate.

The congressmen draw upon the independent state legislature theory, which asserts that state lawmakers have the sole authority to regulate federal elections — without input from other bodies like courts, or independent redistricting commissions — unless Congress intervenes. Although several other states bar partisan gerrymandering in their constitutions, Utah’s does not include such an explicit provision.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 316. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Iowa pig farmer warns Supreme Court upholding 'troubling' California law will raise prices, destroy businessesA fourth-generation Iowa farmer, Dwight Mogler, reacted to the Supreme Court upholding a California law that could put pork producers out of business.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Editorial: The Supreme Court just fired a shot at how Illinois handles delinquent property taxesPrivate vultures have been scamming the Illinois system of tax sales. But the Supreme Court has implied the practice needs to change.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »

‘Trump too small’ trademark clash to be decided by Supreme CourtThe dispute is over whether lawyer Steve Elster can register 'Trump too small' as a trademark for use on T-shirts.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court to review trademark dispute over ‘TRUMP TOO SMALL’The Supreme Court announced Monday it would hear a trademark case over the use of a person’s name without the individual’s permission in a dispute over the phrase “TRUMP TOO SMALL” — a reference to former President Donald Trump.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether T-Shirts Criticizing Trump Are Banned By Trademark LawThe phrase “Trump Too Small” shouldn’t be banned under federal trademark laws, the case argues.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court will decide whether T-shirt mocking Trump as 'too small' can be trademarkedThe Supreme Court will rule on whether a California lawyer has a free speech right to trademark a T-shirt mocking former President Trump as 'too small.'
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »