Supreme Court weighs whether Alabama’s congressional map violates law

  • 📰 aldotcom
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in June in a case that could result in Alabama redrawing its seven Congressional districts and could affect other states in how the Voting Rights Act is applied.

on the ruling at the request of Alabama election officials, who argued, in part, that it came too late for last year’s elections. That allowed the map to stay in place last year. But the justices’ decision on whether the plan violates the Voting Rights Act is pending.

Lawyers representing state officials and defending the current map have argued that it is similar to those adopted after the census in 2000 and the census in 2010, which were both precleared by the Justice Department. The state’s lawyers said the Legislature drew the current map with race-neutral criteria, making changes to adjust to the population shifts needed after the 2020 census.

Milligan said the three-judge panel’s ruling came after the plaintiffs presented a strong case that met key criteria set by Supreme Court precedents. “Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law explained below, including our assessments of the credibility of expert witnesses, we conclude that the Milligan plaintiffs are substantially likely to establish that the Plan violates Section Two of the Voting Rights Act,” they wrote last year. “More particularly, we conclude that the Milligan plaintiffs are substantially likely to establish each part of the controlling Supreme Court test.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 82. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Urgent Warning That Got Cut From a Supreme Court Opinion 20 Years AgoThis just discovered note was eerily prescient about today's 'plutocracy,' but the justice agreed to delete his warning in exchange for a vote.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Alaska Supreme Court finds former North Pole refinery owner liable for pollutionThe former owner of a North Pole petroleum refinery is financially liable for groundwater pollution that has contaminated drinking-water wells around the refinery, the Alaska Supreme Court said in a ruling published Friday.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

Opinion: The Supreme Court was enabling corruption well before the Clarence Thomas scandalJohn Roberts' court has undone campaign finance safeguards and overturned convictions of public officials for years, most recently that of a onetime aide to Andrew Cuomo.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects lawsuit that sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting child pornography | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a case from a victim of sex trafficking who sought to hold Reddit, an online platform, responsible for hosting images of child pornography on the website.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

It Took Alito Barely a Month to Violate the Supreme Court’s New Ethics RulesThe justices who commit the most ethics violations are also the least likely to follow voluntary ethics guidelines.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

COVID-19 pandemic doesn’t trigger property tax break, Colorado Supreme Court rulesThe justices found that the COVID-19 pandemic was not an “act of nature” that would allow property owners to seek re-assessment of their property values outside of the normal two-year property tax assessment cycle,
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »