Sen. Whitehouse: Supreme Court Justices Are in a 'Fact-Free,' 'Ethics-Free Zone'

  • 📰 RollingStone
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 30 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

'The problem with the Supreme Court is that they're in a fact-free zone as well as an ethics-free zone.'

Whitehouse then went on to explain that there is little accountability for justices once they are confirmed to the court: “You get onto the court, and there you are, and there’s no process for determining what the facts are. That’s part of the problem here. When Justice Thomas failed to recuse himself from the Jan. 6 investigation that turned up his wife’s communications, he made the case that that was okay because he had no idea that she was involved in insurrection activities.

“The problem with the Supreme Court is that they’re in a fact-free zone as well as an ethics-free zone,” Whitehouse concluded. Senator Whitehouse has been focused on the right-wing’s influence over the court for years now and has written a bookof plotting to “capture” the Supreme Court and using it to “achieve through the institution’s power what they cannot through other branches of government.”

In his interview with Todd, Whitehouse compared right-wing billionaires to the railroad barons of the past who would “capture” railroad commissions to do their bidding.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 483. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court delivers blow to wetlands protections in win for Idaho landownersThe Supreme Court weakens a landmark water pollution law by ruling that an Idaho couple's property does not fall under jurisdiction of the 1972 Clean Water Act, so the couple does not require a federal permit to build on the property.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Judge halts South Carolina’s new stricter abortion law until state Supreme Court reviewThe ruling by Judge Clifton Newman came just about 24 hours after Gov. Henry McMaster signed the bill.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court Reins EPA Power in Sackett Homeowner CaseSupreme Court scaled back the EPA’s power under the Clean Water Act (CWA) by defining the “waters of the United States” in Sackett v. EPA.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »

South Carolina judge halts new stricter abortion law until state Supreme Court reviewA judge has put a temporary halt to South Carolina’s new law banning most abortions around six weeks of pregnancy until the state Supreme Court can review the measure.
Source: fox7austin - 🏆 594. / 51 Read more »

Opinion | A Clean Water Landmark for Liberty at the Supreme CourtFrom WSJopinion: Don’t believe the cries that the 5-4 decision in Sackett v. EPA will despoil America’s precious wetlands. The majority simply stopped a regulatory land grab.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Alaskans react to Supreme Court ruling on wetland protectionsThe ruling affects the Clean Water Act, which put wetlands under federal protection, with the move changing how much protection applies to wetlands. Now, only wetlands that have a connection on the surface to regulated bodies of water will be protected.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »