U.S. Supreme Court decision will end federal protections for most Indiana wetlands

  • 📰 wrtv
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court has handed down a decision that will effectively remove federal protections for most of Indiana wetlands. This is a move which rolls back federal safeguards for wetlands under the Clear Water Act.

INDIANAPOLIS — The U.S. Supreme Court has handed down a decision that will effectively remove federal protections for most of Indiana wetlands.

“This decision means the majority of Indiana wetlands will not be protected under current federal law and we don’t have very good protections under state law unfortunately,” said Frank. “We are disappointed. Our wetlands are a crucial part of having healthy rivers, healthy lakes, and safe drinking water.”

“Wetlands are a crucial part of Indiana’s water resources,” said Frank. “They catch and hold excess stormwater, and they’re like giant sponges on the landscape so they help reduce flooding.”“This is great news for farmers and property owners in our state!” read a Facebook post by Attorney General Todd Rokita. “The Supreme Court’s ruling will protect Hoosiers’ jobs, property, and freedom from the Biden admin’s excessive regulations.

In 2021, Indiana passed a law that removed some state protections for wetlands despite more than 100 groups who signed a letter asking the Governor to veto it.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 598. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Chief Justice Roberts says Supreme Court can do more to 'adhere to the highest standards'Chief Justice John Roberts' comments come as an acknowledgment that recent reporting about the justices' ethical missteps is having an effect on public perception of the court.
Source: fox5ny - 🏆 587. / 51 Read more »

Chief Justice John Roberts says putting fence around Supreme Court was ‘hardest decision’Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. says the hardest decision he has made in his nearly two decades on the Supreme Court was putting up a fence around the court last year amid protests over the justices rolling back national abortion rights.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Adnan Syed case: 'Serial' podcast subject's lawyer appeals to Maryland Supreme CourtAdnan Syed's counsel filed a petition that asks the state's highest court to review several legal issues raised by the victim's family, who contended they were not given enough notice to testify at a court hearing.
Source: ABC7NY - 🏆 592. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court gift list: Paintings, guns, and a sculpture of a handAs Congress ramps up scrutiny of gift disclosures, here are some of the unusual items that justices have reported receiving in the past two decades.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

DeSantis’s Weak Supreme Court Pitch Is No Threat to TrumpThe Florida governor can’t outdo Trump’s transformation of the Court, so he’s just promising to keep it going longer.
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »

Explainer-What happens if the US Supreme Court bans affirmative action?The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule by the end of June on whether colleges and universities can continue to consider race as part of their student admissions decisions, a practice known as affirmative action. WHAT IS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION? In the context of higher education, affirmative action typically refers to admissions policies aimed at increasing the number of Black, Hispanic and other minority students on campus.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »