The Supreme Court Doesn’t Want Anything to Do With the Fight Over California’s Foie Gras Ban

  • 📰 RobbReport
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court has weighed in on California's foie gras ban—or rather, they've decided not to. SCOTUS

, which is made from the enlarged livers of ducks and geese, sometimes as the result of force-feeding the animals. Since 2012, California has not allowed the sale of foie gras, although people can legally order it from out-of-state producers. Farmers and others have pushed back against the ban, however, saying that it limits their ability to do business and negatively impacts their livelihood.

The case considered by the Supreme Court has been going on since 2012, but most recently it was on hold as the justices weighed in on another California animal-cruelty law. In that case, the Court supported a law that requires more space for breeding pigs. In a statement, the groups that brought the foie-gras case denounced both that decision and the Supreme Court’s non-decision in the foie-gras debacle.

“Like farmers across the Nation, we are disappointed with the Supreme Court’s fractured ruling in the pork producers’ case, which allowed California’s politicians to tell people what they can and can’t eat,” said Michael Tenenbaum, their attorney. “And we believe the Court should have agreed to add our case to its plate for the upcoming term, since it presents an even more compelling challenge to these nanny-state bans.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 309. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

A Haunting Symbol of What the Supreme Court Has Become Is Right Out FrontWith little recourse to be found anywhere else, people started to show up.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Will a Supreme Court decision in fisheries case tie the hands of all government regulators?Fishing for Atlantic herring may seem worlds away from restrictions on power plant emissions or responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, but a case before the U.S. Supreme Court could affect all those activities and more.
Source: NewsfromScience - 🏆 515. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court won't hear dispute over California law barring sale of foie grasThe Supreme Court says it won't get involved in a dispute over a California animal cruelty law that bars foie gras from being sold in the state.
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »

Harlan Crow, Clarence Thomas' Benefactor, Tells Congress It Can't Investigate the Supreme CourtDon't worry, the GOP megadonor's attorney say he gave the matter 'careful consideration' before reaching this conclusion.
Source: Jezebel - 🏆 153. / 63 Read more »