, in which he attempted to reverse the FDA’s 2000 approval of mifepristone. With its liberal use of language such as “chemical abortion,” “unborn child”/”human” and “abortionist,” the opinion also reads like a page from an anti-abortion playbook. last month, Kacsmaryk’s use of the term “post-aborted women,” aligns him with the “pro-woman/pro-life” anti-abortion fabrication, which claims abortion is inherently traumatic because it subverts God’s plan for women.
It is somewhat of a challenge to make sense out of what Kacsmaryk seems to be saying about the connection between abortion and eugenics. As a starting point, he apparently believes that children fall into one of two—presumably co-equal—categories:“unaborted” , which means they have made it safely out of the womb into the world of the actually born.