argued he should be given the go-ahead to bring a case over the decision of the executive committee for the protection of royalty and public figures that people should not be allowed to pay privately for their protective security.
Harry’s renewed case is related to an earlier attempt to challenge the decision that he would no longer be given the same degree of personal protective security when visiting the UK after stepping back as a working royal and moving to the US.
She told the court: “Ravec had exceeded its authority, its power, because it doesn’t have the power to make this decision in the first place.” “It cannot be right that officers are expected to expose themselves to that level of risk not in the public interest but because the policing body has been financially compensated,” he said. “That can only be justified with public interest.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »