The provincial government has had enough. But its response was unusual. It tabled a bill that applies only to this specific project, at this specific time and“despite any decision of a court to the contrary … the public hearing … is conclusively deemed to have been validly held.”
The group lambasted the bill as undemocratic. But this both misses the point, as the legislature is acting with a democratic mandate of its own, and begs the question of when people’s decisions about what to do with their land should be subject to political meddling.Article content And this brings us to the second, and worst, problem: the bill picks favourites. The rule of law not only speaks to whether and how courts look at laws and decisions, but also how laws should be designed in the first place. Among other things, laws should consist of general rules for the future ― not commands or exemptions directed at particular people.Article content
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »