Friday’s 5-2 rulings also mean that state lawmakers should have greater latitude in drawing General Assembly seat boundaries for elections next year and the rest of the decade, and that the voter ID law approved by the legislature in late 2018 could be carried out soon.
But the remaining Democratic justices and their allies lambasted the decisions that reversed new precedents on redistricting and voter ID. Chief Justice Paul Newby, writing the majority opinion in the redistricting case, said that the previous Democratic majority erred by declaring that the state constitution outlawed extensive partisan gerrymandering. The the General Assembly drew because they said it gave Republicans outsized electoral advantage compared to their voting power.
Associate Justice Anita Earls, writing the dissenting opinion, said the court correctly ruled last year to ensure all North Carolina residents “regardless of political party, were not denied their ‘fundamental right to vote on equal terms.’ ... Today, the majority strips the people of this right.” Although a federal lawsuit challenging the voter ID law is still pending, the State Board of Elections said Friday that staff would start working toward “a smooth rollout” of the ID requirement with municipal elections this fall.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »