Supreme Court's Alito says abortion leak meant to intimidate court, Wall Street Journal reports

  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 97%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito believes the leak last May of a draft opinion that ended the nationwide right to abortion was meant to 'intimidate' the court into changing its decision, the conservative justice told the Wall Street Journal.

Protestors react outside the U.S. Supreme Court to the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision later this year, in Washington, U.S., May 2, 2022. REUTERS/Jonathan ErnstWASHINGTON, April 28 - U.S.

The comments by the justice, part of the court's 6-3 conservative majority, come after the court in January said its eight-month investigation had failed to identify the party responsible for disclosing a draft that would foreshadow the court's decision in June eliminating the right to legalized abortion nationwide.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 2. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | A terrible silence from the Supreme Court, where ethics have gone awryOpinion by Ruth Marcus: The Supreme Court is doing itself — and the country — a terrible disservice with its highhanded dismissal of its homegrown ethics issues. John Roberts was right not to testify. But the court is all wrong about its ethical problems.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix neededThe Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken. The justices’ response struck some critics and ethics experts as tone deaf at a time of heightened attention on the justices activities and a historic dip in public approval as measured by opinion polls. While the court’s six conservatives and three liberals have been deeply divided on some of the most contentious issues of the day including abortion, gun rights and the place of religion in public life, they seem united on this particular principle: on ethics they will set their own rules and police themselves.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Bipartisan Senate bill would require Supreme Court to impose code of conductThe legislation would also require the Supreme Court to appoint an official to handle complaints alleging violations of the code or federal laws.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Murkowksi, King introduce Supreme Court code of conduct billThe bill would require the Supreme Court to implement the code within one year from the bill becoming a law, and would create checks intended to prevent Supreme Court justices from engaging in questionable or unethical behavior.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »

Naperville gun shop owner takes his case against state ban to U.S. Supreme CourtA Naperville gun shop owner has taken his case against the state's ban on certain high-powered weapons to the U.S. Supreme Court by asking it to halt the ban while he appeals rulings against his legal challenges.
Source: dailyherald - 🏆 317. / 59 Read more »

Liberals changing sex offender registry in response to Supreme Court decisionThe new law would also add new entries to the list of offences that can result in someone’s registration, including the non-consensual sharing of intimate images and extortion. cdnpoli
Source: TheStarPhoenix - 🏆 253. / 63 Read more »