The law also caps the purchase of magazines at 10 rounds for long guns and 15 for handguns and made rapid-fire devices known as switches illegal because they turn firearms into fully automatic weapons.
Pritzker’s signature came six months after a man used an AR-15-style semiautomatic rifle to kill seven people and wound more than 48 others at the Highland Park Fourth of July parade. Bevis challenged the law in the U.S. District Court in Chicago, arguing that his Law Weapons & Supply business suffered because of the ban and might end up closing if it can’t sell the popular guns. His lawsuit was just one of several seeking to overturn the ban.
Bevis’ lawyers have cited earlier Supreme Court rulings that weapons must be found to be "dangerous and unusual" to be banned. Because assault-style rifles are "commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes," they can’t be banned because they are "not unusual," they argued.The White House is demanding that Congress take action.
But U.S. District Judge Virginia Kendall turned Bevis down, finding that the ban was "constitutionally sound." Kendall wrote that "because assault weapons are particularly dangerous weapons … their regulation accords with history and tradition."His latest appeal was submitted to Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who handles such appeals from the 7th Circuit.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Source: dailyherald - 🏆 317. / 59 Read more »
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »