The court took up two separate cases involving much-lower-profile figures — two members of the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees in southern California and the city manager of Port Huron, Michigan. But the legal dispute is the same: Can blocking someone on social media give rise to a free speech violation under the Constitution’s First Amendment?
In the California case, board members Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane in 2017 blocked Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, parents of students in the school district, from commenting on their Facebook pages, and in the case of O’Connor-Ratcliff, responded to her Twitter posts. Zane has since left office.
The Michigan case arose in March 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic broke out. City Manager James Freed posted information on his Facebook page, which described him as a “public figure,” about efforts the city was taking to deal with the public health crisis. Freed says the Facebook page, which is no longer active, was a personal page. He used it to share pictures of his family and comment on his daily activities, he added.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
AOC Rebukes Alito 'Tantrum' and\u00a0 'Highly Politicized' Supreme Court'In our system of checks and balances, SCOTUS’s reckless behavior warrants a check from the legislative and executive branches,' says AOC. This is not unprecedented, it's how our system is designed to avert tyranny.'
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »