The justices, in a 6-3 decision, sent Reed's case back to a lower court for his constitutional challenge to the state's law on DNA testing.
The issue before the high court was whether Reed, sentenced to death nearly 25 years ago, waited too long to file his lawsuit claiming that untested crime-scene evidence would exonerate him. Texas courts and the federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled that he missed the deadline.Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.
Reed was sentenced to death for the 1996 killing of 19-year-old Stacey Stites. Prosecutors said Reed raped and strangled Stites as she made her way to work at a supermarket in Bastrop, a rural community about 30 miles southeast of Austin. Reed has long maintained that Stites' fiance, former police officer Jimmy Fennell, was the real killer. Reed said Fennell was angry because Stites, who was white, was having an affair with Reed, who is Black. Fennell, who served time for sexual assault and was released from prison in 2018, has denied killing Stites.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court lets Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed pursue DNA lawsuitJUST IN: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that longtime Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed should have a chance to argue for testing of crime-scene evidence that he says will help clear him
Source: cbsaustin - 🏆 595. / 51 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court boosts Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed's DNA testing bidThe U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday gave a boost to Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed's bid for DNA testing of crime-scene evidence that he argues will help exonerate him in the 1996 abduction, rape and murder of a 19-year-old woman. I hope the truth is revealed. What kind of lynch mob justice is it that Texas tries to deny a man facing the death penalty the right to test the evidence, and which may prove him innocent? And where 3 Supreme Court justices then agree the evidence should not be tested either? In too many criminal cases,the pros uetor with hold evidence ,to insure a conviction. Every state has this problem.ego the innocents project.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court lets Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed pursue DNA lawsuitThe Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that longtime Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed should have a chance to argue for testing of crime-scene evidence that he says will help clear him.
Source: SpectrumNews1TX - 🏆 333. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court lets Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed pursue DNA lawsuitIn a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sent Rodney Reed's case back to a lower court for a chance to argue for testing of crime-scene evidence that he says will help clear him.
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court sides with Rodney Reed on request for DNA evidenceThe U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for death row inmate Rodney Reed to seek evidence he argues would prove his innocence, rejecting Texas' claim that he took too long to challenge state DNA procedures.
Source: KUT - 🏆 77. / 68 Read more »
Long-time Texas death row inmate can pursue DNA testing following decision by Supreme CourtRodney Reed, a long-time Texas death row inmate, will be able to test DNA that he believes will clear him, following a decision by the Supreme Court. I'm all for the death penalty after everything that could clear the inmate has been exhausted.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »