that allowed search engines and social media platforms to exist in the first place. It’s messy, and it feels like all of those decisions are up for grabs in what promises to be a decade of litigation.
So now imagine that you are Google, which on the one hand operates YouTube, and on the other hand is racing to build generative AI products like Bard, which is… trained by scraping tons of data from the internet under a permissive interpretation of fair use that will definitely get challenged in a wave of lawsuits.
I asked Google’s Malon about this dilemma, and he said “it’s not up to YouTube to determine who ‘owns the rights’ to content. This is between the parties involved, and is why we give copyright holders tools to make copyright claims and uploaders tools to dispute claims they believe are made incorrectly. Matters that cannot be resolved through our dispute process may ultimately need to be decided by a court.
YouTube only continues to exist because of a delicate dance that keeps rightsholders happy, but the future of Google is a bet on an expansive interpretation of copyright lawthe AI explosion, and now there’s basically no way for Google to avoid some major litigation here. YouTube only continues to exist because of a delicate dance that keeps rightsholders happy and the music industry paid, but the future of Google itself is a bet on an expansive interpretation of copyright law that every creative industry from music to movies to news hates and will fight to the death. Because itdeath: generative AI tools promise to completely upend the market for almost all commodity creative work, and these companies are not required to sit back and let it happen.
kortizart reckless how is this a legal trap? Just make a rule „no impersonating“ (or smth similar) Or „no impersonating in relation with ai“ And ban it Sure you dont have copyright but the ai artist also cant claim copyright on ai
reckless
reckless The Dutch Book is open. Wagers please.
reckless Youtube has to support AI cos if they dont, they can say bye bye to all the so called AI technologies they are working on because these thing are trained on other people's work. They have to be biased.
reckless I can see it more likely to fall in favour of AI rather than the labels. Fair use and copyright has been a huge argument since the 90s, to the point current laws have created a compromise and reduced art to a commodity anyway. AI will only enforce that.
reckless The Fair Use argument needs to be updated. There's an insane amount of copyright infringement on YouTube and TikTok. It's kind of wild that AI is what will finally spark some change.
reckless Celebrities are just mad that machines can actually do it better. They were fine with AI when it came for the working Joe/Jane but now they want to cry 'muh rights' when it comes for THEIR dollar. I'm glad this is hitting everyone equally.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »