While the issue currently before the court is a technical one that hinges on judicial and administrative processes and not the merits of the parties’ abortion-rights arguments, it will still have the kind of substantive national impact justices vowed in thewould somehow get them out of the business of dealing with abortion cases,” said Stephen Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “One would have to have remarkable blinders on not to have seen that.
Though the 5th Circuit’s order that now sits before the Supreme Court wouldn’t go as far as Texas district court judge Matthew Kacsmaryk,to cut off access to the pills nationwide, it would roll back access to abortion pills for millions of people, including those in Democratic-led states that have voted to protect abortion rights.
“The rights of fragile unborn children cannot simply be ‘left to the states,’” the group SBA Pro-Life Americaruling. “According to our estimates, [blue states that support abortion rights] account for approximately 55% of abortions that take place nationwide.”
Abortion is not legal nationally now due to the Supreme Court. Didn’t you read the ruling a few months ago? This is old news.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »