U.S. Supreme Court empowers bids to curb authority of federal agencies

  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 56 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 97%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday made it easier to challenge the regulatory power of federal agencies in two important rulings backing Axon Enterprise Inc's bid to sue the Federal Trade Commission and a Texas accountant's gripe with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

April 14 - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday made it easier to challenge the regulatory power of federal agencies in two important rulings backing Axon Enterprise Inc's

The justices also unanimously upheld a lower court's decision allowing the accountant, Michelle Cochran, to sue the SEC, challenging the legality of its in-house judges, after the agency faulted her audits of publicly traded companies. "We now conclude that the review schemes set out in the Exchange Act and the FTC Act do not displace district court jurisdiction over Axon's and Cochran's far-reaching constitutional claims," liberal justice Elena Kagan wrote in the ruling.

The Supreme Court's conservative justices have signaled wariness toward expansive federal regulatory power and the previously recognized duty of judges, under Supreme Court precedent, to give deference to that authority. The company said the agency acts as "prosecutor, judge and jury" in violation of the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment guarantees of due process and equal protection under the law, and that its administrative law judges are unlawfully insulated from the president's power to control executive branch officers under the Constitution's Article II.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Congress makes laws not the agencies in the executive branch

Not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, government overreach can be detrimental to small businesses. On the other hand, letting large companies exploit land, resources and consumers is detrimental to the whole country.

Hear! Hear!

S.E.C. 1st

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 2. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

DOJ asks Supreme Court to block federal court rulings restricting abortion pillsNEW: The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to block federal court rulings that imposed restrictions on the widely used abortion pill mifepristone.
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »

Legal abortions fell 6% in six months after Supreme Court overturned RoeLegal abortions in the US dropped more than 6% in the six months after SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade, a testament to the new rules and regulations that now vary from state to state. There were an average of 5,377 fewer abortions per month. That's well over 60 thousand lives saved over a 1 year period... We need to do more but thankful for that at least. That is what happens when you ban stuff. So bans do work.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

What can the Supreme Court Dobbs decision tell us about abortion pill challenges?The Supreme Court could be roped back into an abortion dispute due to conflicting rulings in lower courts over the drug mifepristone, nearly a year after a leak paved the way for overturning Roe v. Wade. Who leaked the Dobbs decision. Get to work Roberts. How did the leak “pave the way” for Roe being overturned? That makes literally no sense. If anything it was an attempt to stop the inevitable. And how on earth don’t they know who did it to this day?
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Does U.S. Supreme Court need an ethics overhaul?🎧 The Ethical Life podcast: The hosts discuss how the recent revelations about Clarence Thomas further erodes the trust many Americans have in their government. What supreme court decisions did it supposedly affect? This is led by racist leftists who can't stand seeing an African American that they can't control. Investigate all politicians that go on vacation with rich friends!
Source: TucsonStar - 🏆 339. / 59 Read more »

Does U.S. Supreme Court need an ethics overhaul?🎧 The Ethical Life podcast: The hosts discuss how the recent revelations about Clarence Thomas further erodes the trust many Americans have in their government.
Source: dothaneagle - 🏆 337. / 59 Read more »

Here's why the Supreme Court must adopt clear ethical guidelinesRichard Kyte: After questions were raised about luxury trips Justice Clarence Thomas took with a Republican mega-donor, urgent action is necessary in order to regain the public's trust. Only democrats raised questions and it's all about politics.
Source: TucsonStar - 🏆 339. / 59 Read more »