Judge affirms stricter interpretation of federal mining law

  • 📰 kgun9
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Another judge has adopted a U.S. appellate court’s stricter interpretation of a century-and-a-half-old mining law in a new ruling that blocks a metals mine in Nevada.

RENO, Nev. — Another judge has adopted a U.S. appellate court's stricter interpretation of a century-and-a-half-old mining law in a new ruling that blocks a metals mine in Nevada. The ruling could have ramifications for a huge lithium mine near the Nevada-Oregon line and other future mines on public lands across the West.

That ruling blocked construction of a copper mine based on the conclusion those rights don't automatically apply to the neighboring national forest lands where the company planned to dump the waste rock. “BLM cannot skirt the Mining Law requirement that valuable mineral deposits must be found in order to occupy the land," he wrote March 31.

Lithium is used in the manufacture of batteries for electric vehicles — a key part of President Joe Biden's “clean energy” agenda intended to speed a transition from fossil fuels to renewables. “All three rulings now say you can't bury waste there unless you find valuable minerals," he said. “The Rosemont issue would apply to basically every big mine in the West."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

No lithium mining in USA?!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 584. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Feds propose reducing Colorado River water to California, Nevada and Arizona in “shot across the bow”In the coming weeks, federal officials must decide whether to impose cuts on the three lower Colorado River Basin states by either following the longstanding system of water-rights seniority or by …
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Judge, Fox attorney clash over TV hosts' testimony in Dominion defamation caseNEW: A lawyer representing Fox News against Dominion's defamation suit clashed with the judge over how some of the network's top stars can be questioned on the witness stand. Typically when lawyers clash with Judges, the Judge wins. Love it - 'If you have Fox hosts testify that they didn't say these things, I'll turn to the jury and say you are (lying)'. Brutal. You do not “clash” with a judge. In the end, you obey the rules that the court puts in place or you will have a very bad day.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »