In response Thursday, the Justice Department said it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency order to put any action on hold.
In the 2-1 vote, the panel of judges put on hold changes made by the regulator since 2016 that relaxed the rules for prescribing and dispensing mifepristone. Those included extending the period of pregnancy when the drug can be used from seven weeks to 10, and also allowing it to be dispensed by mail, without any need to visit a doctor’s office.
The two judges who voted to tighten restrictions, Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew Oldham, are both appointees of former President Donald Trump. The third judge, Catharina Haynes, is an appointee of former President George W. Bush. She said she would have put the lower court ruling on hold entirely for now to allow oral arguments in the case.
When the drug was initially approved in 2000, the FDA limited its use to up to seven weeks of pregnancy. It also required three in-person office visits: the first to administer mifepristone, the next to administer the second drug misoprostol and the third to address any complications. It also required a doctor’s supervision and a reporting system for any serious consequences associated with the drug.
to limit how law enforcement and state officials collect medical records if they investigate women who flee their home states to seek abortions elsewhere.that condemned the Texas ruling and warned that FDA approval of other drugs could be at risk if U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk's decision stands.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
DOJ seeks 'emergency relief' over abortion pill restrictions at Supreme CourtThe Justice Department plans to ask the Supreme Court to intervene after an appeals court froze part of a Texas judge's order that would have suspended that government authorization of abortion drug mifepristone.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
DOJ to appeal abortion pill decision to Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court will again have the final say on the U.S. abortion landscape. I’m sure the Supreme Court will have a measured and not at all ideological response to this
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
DOJ to ask Supreme Court to put abortion pill limits on holdA federal appeals court has ruled that the abortion pill mifepristone can still be used for now but reduced the period of pregnancy when the drug can be taken and said it could not be dispensed by mail. The decision late Wednesday temporarily narrowed a ruling by a lower court judge in Texas that had completely blocked the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the nation’s most commonly used method of abortion. In response Thursday, the Justice Department said it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency order to put any action on hold. Doj insists that the murder pill be available? I trust Gardner as far as I can throw my oak tree in my front yard!! 'Medication'? Medications are supposed to heal people. This kills a person. It's not a 'medication'.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Can Democrats Actually Hold Clarence Thomas — And The Supreme Court — Accountable?With revelations that Thomas secretly accepted gifts from a conservative billionaire for decades, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin has called on Chief Justice John Roberts to investigate misconduct in the court. Nothing will be done 😴😴😴 This is BS!!! Why not investigate Nancy !
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »
Delaware Supreme Court affirms homicide conviction of North Carolina trucker in fatal highway crashA trucker was convicted of homicide after his trailer plowed into several vehicles on the highway, killing two people. The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the convictions.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Senate Democrats Will Hold Hearing on Supreme Court Ethics Amid Thomas ScandalDemocrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are planning to hold a hearing on the “ethical standards” of the Supreme Court in the midst of a major scandal surrounding Justice Clarence Thomas. SenateDems JudiciaryDems Yay!
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »