Muhammad Shafee: Najib to use Federal Court’s dissenting judgment to support royal pardon bid

  • 📰 malaymail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 29 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 86%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

KUALA LUMPUR, April 3 — A lawyer representing Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today the Federal Court’s dissenting judgment in refusing the former prime minister’s bid for it to...

KUALA LUMPUR, April 3 — A lawyer representing Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today the Federal Court’s dissenting judgment in refusing the former prime minister’s bid for it to review its ruling last year will be used to support his client’s bid for a royal pardon.

“Our pardon is exactly what Abdul Rahman said in his judgment. Our request for pardon is not because ‘I’m sorry, and therefore, I throw myself upon your mercy, no’. Muhammad Shafee said the King needed to make a comparison of the judgments because one senior judge had agreed with the defence’s contention.

Abdul Rahman, who was chairing the five-judge bench, was the only judge who dissented or disagreed with the majority., Abdul Rahman said Najib ought to be acquitted and discharged of all criminal charges since an injustice had taken place.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

13 judges found him guilty. I hope you also put that in your report

YDPA IS NOT GOING TO BE SWAYED BY ONE JUDGES AS COMPARED TO THE DECISION OF THIRTEEN JUDGES

1 HC judge, 3 COA judges, 5 FC judges & on appeal, 4 FC judges found him guilty. Only 1 FC judge out of the total 14 judges dissented. 1 out of 14 judges i.e. 7% = solid grounds for royal pardon? The other 93% sweep under the carpet?😂😂😂

Make sure u guys doit succesfully this time.

Huh if he gets pardon then all those for lesser crime should get as well ..

It's time we stop giving headlines to mediocre ideas/statements/ personalities( unless it's to highlight stupidity)

When it comes to jobs & $ they always talk abt d majority's rights. But when it comes to convicted criminal NajibRazak serving 12 years in prison & facing a Rm210m fine, these same fascists are suggesting a minority 1-4 judges opinion should rule. What monsters are these ppl?

Sudah sudah lah

Does he thinks that YDPA cannot make a good decision?

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 Based on 1/14 Opinions!! Furthermorw, that One was all about TPT's stuff ups. Nothing on guilty was not safe nor raised a doubt!!

With a peguambela like this no wonder lah Najib kalah

Whatever...the bsll is in your court

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 1. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Despite Federal Court rejection, Najib’s legacy seen surviving thanks to strange bedfellowsKuala Lumpur: Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s political career will likely survive his latest legal defeat in the Federal Court as former rivals who would have pounced on the former prime minister’s disgrace were no longer likely to twist the knife, said analysts.
Source: DailyExpress_MY - 🏆 3. / 83 Read more »

Order of acquittal, discharge should be given to Najib, says dissenting judgePUTRAJAYA: The previous Federal Court panel was likely to be unfair to Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak when it heard and dismissed his appeal against conviction and sentence in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case when he was not legally represented, says the sole dissenting judge. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Why focus on dissenting decision? The majority found him guilty. Move on lah Something is brewing behind the scene here.
Source: staronline - 🏆 4. / 75 Read more »