Liberals unite with Trump Supreme Court nominees in decision against federal land grab

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 68 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 94%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

SCOTUS Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the court's three liberal members, was joined in her majority opinion by three appointees of former President Trump in siding with Montana property owners who sought to cut away attempts at federal land grabs.

The 6-3 ruling allows a pair of Montana landowners to resume their battle against the Forest Service after it supposedly altered the terms of access to a road that intersects their property near the Bitterroot National Forest. The majority held that landowners Larry “Wil” Wilkins and Jane Stanton did not surpass the statutory deadline for the challenge.

The decision effectively reverses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit's decision to affirm a district court's dismissal of the landowners' claims, stating that QTA's 12-year statute of limitations is a"nonjurisdictional claims-processing rule." The case was remanded to the 9th Circuit for further proceedings.

The case, Wilkins v. United States, specifically pertains to a road the Forest Service had an easement for allowing public access. But the plaintiffs argued it was rarely used for that purpose until the agency erected a sign in 2006 stating"public access thru private lands." The sign led to more visitors to the road, and property owners said there were trespassers who stole their property and claimed that one of them shot Wilkins's cat.

With the help of Trump-appointed Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch, the Tuesday decision marks a continuation of a string of opinions released so far this year with liberal Justices Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson in the majority.Justice Clarence Thomas, an appointee of former President George H. W.

"The Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations functions as a condition on a waiver of sovereign immunity, and is therefore jurisdictional," Thomas wrote in his summary.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

They probably didn’t like it though, pretty sure they didn’t want to have their name on this writ for supporting Biden’s land grab for all eternity, at least the liberals were smart enough in this instance.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court turns away challenge to Trump's tariffs on steel importsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to U.S. steel import tariffs imposed in 2018 under former President Donald Trump - a policy he touted as defending American national security - and largely maintained by President Joe Biden. Trump right AGAIN ⏩ good! tax the shit out of that chinese garbage!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Mexico government to challenge Supreme Court suspension of electoral reformThe Mexican government said Sunday it would challenge the Supreme Court's temporary suspension of parts of a controversial electoral reform pushed by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Some of the translation from Spanish too Literal. I makes both the government and court look a bit childish which I believe is unfair to them.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

'Poop-themed dog toys' face Supreme Court showdown in trademark disputeThe Supreme Court to debate whether Jack Daniel's has to grin and bear it over humorous dog 'poop-themed' toys that bear a resemblance to its iconic whiskey bottles. Wonder who will win this case This is such a waste of time. Jesus.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel’s dog toy disputeThe question for the court has to do with whether the toy makers infringed on Jack Daniel’s trademarks. Thanks for reporting the real news. You guys are doing gods work 🫡
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »

US Supreme Court examines law against encouraging illegal immigrationThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider whether a federal law that made it a crime for a person to encourage illegal immigration violates constitutional free speech protections in a case involving a California man who deceived immigrants through a phony 'adult adoption' program. Helaman Hansen is a convicted scam artist and criminal. There is zero ambiguity as to that. However vague First Amendment violations should scare us all. 👀 Some of the best workers i know We couldn't be more excited to hear that the US Supreme Court is examining a law to discourage illegal immigration. After all, we all know how important it is to uphold this law and keep immigrants out.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

ACLU asks US Supreme Court to review N.H.'s criminal defamation statuteThe law's critics allege it is a tool for those in positions of power, including members of law enforcement, to silence those who speak out against them. The statute is also unevenly applied, the ACLU contends.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »