Supreme Court to hear lawsuit involving disability activist

  • 📰 CBSNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 56 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court will decide whether a disabled activist can file disability rights lawsuits against hotels she doesn't intend to visit.

The high court said Monday it would decide a case involving Deborah Laufer. Laufer, who lives in Florida, has filed over 600 federal lawsuits against hotel owners and operators, according to a Supreme CourtLaufer has a vision impairment, uses a cane or wheelchair to get around, and has limited use of her hands, according to court documents.

Under the federal Americans With Disabilities Act hotels must identify and describe their accessible features including guest rooms in sufficient detail. Laufer's lawsuits and lawsuits by other self-appointed"testers" have divided federal appeals courts. The question is whether Laufer and others have suffered an injury that gives them the ability to sue, called"standing." Some courts have ruled that people who never intend to visit the accommodations they are challenging can nonetheless sue. Other courts have declined to allow the lawsuits.

The case the court agreed to hear involves the Coast Village Inn and Cottages in Wells, Maine. A federal trial court dismissed Laufer's lawsuit alleging the hotel's website contained insufficient information on disability accommodations. But a federal appeals court allowed the case to go forward. The hotel currently has a notice at the top of its website that reads:"Please Note: Unfortunately, we do not have the capabilities to provide pet-friendly or ADA compliant lodging. We apologize for the inconvenience!"

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It sounds to far fetch especially if your not planning on visiting.

You gotta love this SCOTUS picking and choosing which litigants they think are acting in good faith and which ones aren’t. Surprise! It’s always conservative causes whom they decide are acting in good faith.

So to silence them they’ll pay a minimum to the disabled and the lawyers will be paid plenty. See how this works?

--- Laws Have Been Passed Against Dope They Don't Intend To Smoke

She has no (ahem) standing.

Sounds like she just wants a really big payday.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 87. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Dark Money-Fueled Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidate’s Anti-Abortion Views Span DecadesThe billionaire-backed State Supreme Court candidate Daniel Kelly once wrote that “God’s law” applies in court.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »

Scope of IRS powers tops Supreme Court's busy docket of arguments and opinionsThe Supreme Court will issue at least one opinion this week while it weighs a packed docket of cases, including a request by the IRS to allow its agents to secretly obtain financial records without the need to notify account holders. Weaken those rat bastards
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Mexico government to challenge Supreme Court suspension of electoral reformThe Mexican government said Sunday it would challenge the Supreme Court's temporary suspension of parts of a controversial electoral reform pushed by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Some of the translation from Spanish too Literal. I makes both the government and court look a bit childish which I believe is unfair to them.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

'Poop-themed dog toys' face Supreme Court showdown in trademark disputeThe Supreme Court to debate whether Jack Daniel's has to grin and bear it over humorous dog 'poop-themed' toys that bear a resemblance to its iconic whiskey bottles. Wonder who will win this case This is such a waste of time. Jesus.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel’s dog toy disputeThe question for the court has to do with whether the toy makers infringed on Jack Daniel’s trademarks. Thanks for reporting the real news. You guys are doing gods work 🫡
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »

US Supreme Court examines law against encouraging illegal immigrationThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider whether a federal law that made it a crime for a person to encourage illegal immigration violates constitutional free speech protections in a case involving a California man who deceived immigrants through a phony 'adult adoption' program. Helaman Hansen is a convicted scam artist and criminal. There is zero ambiguity as to that. However vague First Amendment violations should scare us all. 👀 Some of the best workers i know We couldn't be more excited to hear that the US Supreme Court is examining a law to discourage illegal immigration. After all, we all know how important it is to uphold this law and keep immigrants out.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »