Constitutional experts have backed the proposed Indigenous voice as a “safe and sensible” legal option, dismissing concerns that the advisory body would be too powerful.
The latest version states parliament will “have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.” Asmi Wood, a constitutional professor at the Australian National University, is also on the government’s expert legal group. He backed the change to the amendment.
😹😹😹 the guardian performing its sole function of publishing propaganda
The court already strikes down decisions for ‘insufficient consultation’, so court intervention is guaranteed whenever the Voice don’t get what they want. A nightmare for any future government and the country, but lawyers will be able to buy that holiday home and second Porsche.
He he, support is falling for apartheid. Pull out the ‘safe and effective’ argument! Not even once comrade.
It’s apartheid and a gravy train for inner city grifters
I think I’ll stick with my intention to vote no
Some experts say yes and some experts say no. Who knows who or what to believe. Better to be safe than sorry. Hopefully it will all be over soon.
No, they don’t say that.
The Voice Plan, Who knows, Albo won’t give us all the details. Indigenous job quotas 10% including judges, magistrates Etc.
Some other lawyers disagree and think the VoiceToParliament will certainly face legal challenges. And when lawyers can't agree it goes to court in costly and drawn out legal battles. Checkmate. Australia would be CRAZY to vote yes. Sorry. auspol auspol2023
'experts say' = Bottom burps.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »