Several of the five-member panel of justices hearing the appeal of an Alberta decision that found the act unconstitutional quizzed Ottawa's representatives about whether the legislation is too broad.
That was one of the main concerns expressed by Alberta when it asked the province's Appeal Court for a reference on the issue.Rowe said the act gives Ottawa the power to use areas of federal jurisdiction to force unconnected policies on other governments. "There may be an effect which is negative, but there could also be other effects," he said. "The whole picture has to be taken into account in the public interest."
Dayna Anderson, Rupar's co-counsel, argued the legislation is needed to ensure national consistency in environmental standards. "Alberta and the interveners in support of its position would have this court upend decades of settled law," said Anna Johnston of the West Coast Environmental Law Association."It would be both illogical and perverse if Parliament could control or limit Indigenous people -- their rights and interests -- but didn't have the ability to protect those rights and interests," said Mae Price, representing Alberta's Mikisew Cree First Nation.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Hearings begin before Supreme Court on federal environmental impact assessment law | Globalnews.caAlberta is particularly concerned about the effect the law might have on its ability to export its oil through pipelines.
Source: GlobalCalgary - 🏆 50. / 61 Read more »
Braid: Smith laments judicial punch-up that hurts Alberta's chances in Supreme CourtThe judge got himself punched out, and that may hurt Alberta\u0027s chances when the \u0027no more pipelines law\u0027 comes before the Supreme Court
Source: calgaryherald - 🏆 64. / 52 Read more »
Alberta faces off against Ottawa this week in Supreme Court over 'no more pipelines' lawThe federal government is asking the Supreme Court to overrule a Court of Appeal of Alberta opinion that declared the 2019 IAA to be unconstitutional. Mmhmm cuz the 66% increase in conflict with no environmental policies since Trudeau took office is soooo much better for the environment and ever changing weather for Canada and Canadians. Go Alberta Alberta doesn't stand a chance. This is the same Supreme Court that believes it is 'cruel and unconstitutional' that mass murderers receive a life sentence without the chance of parole. BringBackTheDeathPenalty
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Alberta faces off against Ottawa this week in Supreme Court over 'no more pipelines' lawThe federal government is asking the Supreme Court to overrule a Court of Appeal of Alberta opinion that declared the 2019 IAA to be unconstitutional. More wasted tax dollars. Are these the same people who go on about the deficit, spending, and “printing money”?
Source: OttawaCitizen - 🏆 21. / 68 Read more »
Alberta faces off against Ottawa this week in Supreme Court over 'no more pipelines' lawThe federal government is asking the Supreme Court to overrule a Court of Appeal of Alberta opinion that declared the 2019 IAA to be unconstitutional.
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »
Alberta faces off against Ottawa this week in Supreme Court over 'no more pipelines' lawThe federal government is asking the Supreme Court to overrule a Court of Appeal of Alberta opinion that declared the 2019 IAA to be unconstitutional. And yet clueless people and Calgary will still vote for the NDP. Rachel Notley supports a criminal in Ottawa Trudeau through her boss who she takes her orders from Jagmeet Singh.
Source: calgarysun - 🏆 63. / 52 Read more »