It would appear that the court’s statement, coming outside of any proceedings in the hallowed chamber of the court, is tantamount to showing itself, and, some have stated, baring its fangs. However, their Lordships have gone through, or still going through the tradition of wearing thick cloths against public criticism which in the past has not dented the revered image of the apex court.
Since the Electoral Act does not support their desire, many Nigerians considered the court’s verdict as controversial and have criticized them as such. The court’s reaction is certainly surprising. It is granted that judicial independence accords the Supreme Court the freedom to decide disputes and interpret the Constitution and law in accordance with legal principles and a sense of justice, no matter whose ox is gored; However, the Supreme Court should be reminded that it is accountable to the people in terms of its overall performance and in meeting the justice needs of the people in a timely and efficient manner.
Although Akpabio and Lawan did not contest senatorial primary elections in their respective constituencies as a result of their involvement in the Presidential Primaries of the All Progressives Congress , the Supreme Court ordered the INEC to recognise them as candidates for the February 25 elections. Justice is rooted in confidence and perception.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DailyPostNGR - 🏆 11. / 59 Read more »
Source: thecableng - 🏆 2. / 80 Read more »
Source: DailyPostNGR - 🏆 11. / 59 Read more »
Source: MobilePunch - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »