If passed, the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Act would outright ban any use of facial recognition or biometric surveillance by the federal governmentthat use is explicitly approved by an Act of Congress. That approval itself would be pretty limited: It would need to define who was allowed to use biometric surveillance, the exact type of biometric surveillance they would be using and the specific purpose it would be used for.
The bill also hopes to encourage local and state governments to follow its lead, including a clause that would tie some federal funding for local law enforcement to complying with a"substantially similar" ban on facial recognition and biometrics. While the bill hasn't had much luck making it to the floor of either chamber of congress, some states and local governments have been banning facial recognition technology on their own. In 2020,
Third time. Expect the same result.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Lawmakers should check the SEC’s wartime consigliere with legislationOpinion: Gary Gensler is overstepping his authority in attempting to unilaterally craft regulations for cryptocurrency. Congress needs to rein him in. We need a new regulatory body for digital assets. The US has lost put on so much tax revenue already that could be automated at this stage for small and large crypto transactions...but no it wants to use a legacy methodology and definition whilst losing tax revenue.... OK...... We need protections for crypto's security, let's do it CryptoLawUS Meanwhile let’s have a look at $CAI
Source: Cointelegraph - 🏆 562. / 51 Read more »
House lawmakers propose legislation to punish federal employees who censor civilians onlineHouse lawmakers are set to consider legislation that will punish federal employees through civil penalties who use their positions to advocate for censoring civilian viewpoints. I'm willing to show 10 lucky people on how to earn 0.92 BTC ($10,000)and more daily. No withdrawal fee You don't get to send funds to anyone Interested please PM. If a government employee wants someone censored… it should take a court order. Short of that, they’re violating the civil rights of the citizen
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Lawmakers hold press conference to unveil 'Rosie's Law' abortion legislationA new bill is bringing abortion access and emergency contraception back into the spotlight. State Senator Sarah Eckhardt (D-Austin) is one of the lawmaker suppo
Source: cbsaustin - 🏆 595. / 51 Read more »
WATCH LIVE: US lawmakers to introduce legislation on banning TikTokWATCH LIVE: U.S. Senators are expected to unveil legislation on TikTok during a news conference on Tuesday afternoon.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Los Angeles councilmembers to announce new sanctuary city legislation this weekNew rules backed by several councilmembers would prohibit any city resources, property or personnel from being used for any federal immigration enforcement. Lmao city is run by clowns. And here we go again California, let’s cater to that group of people and forget our Veterans.. Sounds about right! Criminals helping criminals!!!!
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »