Serial rapist Matthew McKnight's sentence increases from 8 to 11 years: Court of Appeal

  • 📰 calgarysun
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 52%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Alberta court increased McKnight\u0027s sentence for raping multiple women from eight years to 11, calling initial sentence \u0022demonstrably unfit.\u0022

“While the trial judge sought to avoid a sentence that was too harsh, the totality reduction resulted in a sentence that is lenient to the point of undermining public confidence in the administration of justice,” the panel wrote.

McKnight assaulted the women between 2010 and 2016 when he was a promoter with Urban Sparq Hospitality, drumming up business for now-defunct nightclubs including Knoxville’s Tavern and The Old Strathcona Rack.Article content Eventually, around a dozen of those women came forward claiming McKnight had raped them. He eventually went to trial on 13 counts and after 63 days of testimony and arguments was convicted of five of the rapes.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 63. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Serial rapist Matthew McKnight's sentence increases from 8 to 11 years: Court of AppealAlberta court increased McKnight\u0027s sentence for raping multiple women from eight years to 11, calling initial sentence \u0022demonstrably unfit.\u0022
Source: calgaryherald - 🏆 64. / 52 Read more »

Supreme Court Justice Russell Brown is on a leave of absence | CBC NewsSupreme Court Justice Russell Brown has been on a leave of absence from the court since the beginning of February — something the top court says is related to a confidential matter. This isnt news. It's not unusual for a SCC Justice to not participate in a judgement even though they were present at the appeal. What a coinky-dink. Aren't one-fifth of CBC staff on some-sort of paid leave of absence, too? 'If it's personal leave, it's personal... But we should still be told!' That's not how that works.
Source: natnewswatch - 🏆 58. / 59 Read more »