In this Nov. 22, 1977 file photo, Phyllis Schlafly, a longtime foe of the Equal Rights Amendment, addresses her supporters at a rally at the State Capitol in Springfield, Ill. Illinois for decades remained the only industrial northern state not to ratify the federal Equal Rights Amendment. But decades after the congressional deadline, the state finally approved the resolution.proposed to the states in the 1970s that failed to win enough support to be ratified.
arguing that the ERA should be published as the 28th Amendment of the Constitution because they had decided to ratify it in the 40 years since the cutoff. Their support for the ERA’s ratification, the states argued, should guarantee its passage, even if the deadline for ratification had passed.passed a resolution in support of the effort, and the Senate held a hearing on Tuesday to consider its own resolution validating the ERA. But just as the Senate’s hearing began, the U.S.
This might seem like a niche legal debate, but the implications of the court’s decision are important. First, the decision upholds Article V of the Constitution and the amendment process it prescribes. If Democrats had been allowed to implement an amendment retroactively that was clearly rejected by the public at the time of its introduction, our constitutional order and the very idea of self-government would have been undermined.
Second, the court’s decision prevents Democrats from using the ERA to impose a radical agenda that the public never asked for or approved. The Democrats have made no effort to conceal their true intentions in this fight. They’ve admitted they believe the ERA is the means of prohibiting discrimination on the basis of “gender identity,” which is a nice way of saying they plan to enshrine gender ideology into law.
In other words, the ERA is a Trojan horse for all of the leftist policy preferences that Democrats have no chance of passing legislatively. It’s an attempt to circumvent the legislative process altogether. For that reason alone, the federal appeals court’s decision striking down the Democrats’ deceptive maneuver is a welcome one.and a senior fellow at the Independent Women's Forum
KayleeDMcGhee Yeah why would there be equal rights in 🇺🇸?
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: TucsonStar - 🏆 339. / 59 Read more »