The opinion released Tuesday in a dispute between states over unclaimed money is one of roughly a half dozen she is expected to write by the time the court finishes its work for the summer, usually in late June. The decision was unanimous, though all the justices didn’t join the whole opinion.
Each justice typically writes at least one opinion from the seven separate two-week arguments sessions the court holds from early October to late April. But in January and February, for example, the court has only seven argued cases each month, meaning there are not enough to go around.Jackson, 52, is the first Black woman to serve as a justice and just the third Black person on the court.
Jackson wrote her first dissenting opinion in November, in support of a death row inmate from Ohio who failed to win Supreme Court review of his case. Lawyers for the inmate, Davel Chinn, argued that the state suppressed evidence that might have altered the outcome of his trial. Jackson wrote that she would have ordered lower courts to take another look at the case. Only Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined Jackson’s opinion.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules in MoneyGram case; first majority opinion by Justice JacksonThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of states that say financial instruments that are abandoned should go to the states where they were purchased, not to where the company that sold them is located. She's still a clown.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
How a Supreme Court justice's paragraph put the Voting Rights Act in more dangerJustice Neil Gorsuch tacked on a handful of sentences to a 2021 Supreme Court ruling, planting the seeds of a legal fight that could further weaken Voting Rights Act protections for people of color. Yeah, you people are independent 🤣🙄🤮 What are these protections they are being stripped of? Never specific examples… just vague statements of doom and gloom… which is contrary to recent election turnouts. It seems this argument is detached from reality. And why wouldn't he? What possible consequences does he face? Lifetime appointment, almost 100% guarantee you won't be impeached so why wouldn't they become radicalized?
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
How a Supreme Court justice's paragraph put the Voting Rights Act in more dangerJustice Neil Gorsuch tacked on a handful of sentences to a 2021 Supreme Court ruling, planting the seeds of a legal fight that could further weaken Voting Rights Act protections for people of color. After the fall of Saudi Arabia & Turkey, Islam will rise again in the world through Pakistan. Pakistan will progress in a short amount of time, and lead the revival for Muslims across the world. Muhammad Qasim’s dreams warn us of the future. More at Never did like that this guy was confirmed Of course. 😡
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »
These Supreme Court Cases Could End Affirmative Action at CollegesHere’s what that would look like:
Source: TeenVogue - 🏆 481. / 51 Read more »