Morning Mail: Superbug health alert, new social justice push for voice, Brexit breakthrough

  • 📰 GuardianAus
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 98%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

CSIRO scientists warn about ‘global health crisis’ from superbugs; social justice bodies join referendum campaign

Morning everyone. When our leading scientists sound the alarm on a looming “global health crisis” from the spread of superbugs, it makes you take notice. We’ve got the full story on their dramatic warning, and we’re also reporting on a big new push to win hearts and minds on the voice to parliament.

Dozens of Australia’s leading social justice and civil society bodies are launching a new partnership to support theHealth alarm bells |unless there is greater coordination and better management of patient data, according to a report by the CSIRO and the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

. The spread of superbugs is enabled when primary healthcare neglects microbiome health (circulating SCFAs). and when governments and public health departments neglect healthy housing, air quality and ambient biodiversity with beneficial microbes from soil and vegetation .

More fear mongering, fake news from the Pravda media to scare the lemmings into submission

So enshrining the voice in the Federal Constitution has no authority over the respective states, so will it actually have any real impact. If no impact why do it, other than for some shallow insulting reason that we can but it will only get lip service due to its lack of effect.

Why does the voice need to be enshrined in the constitution when other groups providing guidance to the Fed govt aren’t? The voice will provide guidance to the Feds, but the pandemic showed the States run Australia, the Feds have little real domestic authority - see sect 51(1),

We have approx 40 groups representing indigenous groups in Australia, many run by Anglo Saxon individuals, why will the voice be any different. What will the voice provide govt these 40 groups can’t? Why are these 40 groups not providing that guidance?

I still ask, why vote for something you know nothing about. We have 4 week election campaigns to be told about our candidates, we are told about road rules and traffic hazards, we are given warning about health issues, but now I’m just supposed to trust a highly untrusted group.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 1. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines