How the Supreme Court could reshape the internet as you know it

The Supreme Court is hearing a case that could change liability for some of the internet's largest media companies.

His question sought to explore what might really happen in a world where the Court rolls back a 27-year-old liability shield, allowing tech platforms to be sued over how they host and display videos, forum posts, and other user-generated content.

Understanding how the internet may work differently without Section 230 - or if the law is significantly narrowed - starts with one, simple concept: Shrinking the liability shield means exposing websites and internet users to more lawsuits.Virtually all of the potential consequences for the internet, both good and bad, flow from that single idea.

"The massive social media industry has grown up largely shielded from the courts and the normal development of a body of law. It is highly irregular for a global industry that wields staggering influence to be protected from judicial inquiry," wrote the Anti-Defamation League in a Supreme Court brief."Every other industry has to internalize the costs of its conduct," she said. "Why is it that the tech industry gets a pass? A little bit unclear.

The sheer volume of lawsuits could crush website owners or internet users that can't afford to fight court battles on multiple fronts, leading to the kind of business ripple effects Kavanaugh raised. That could include personal blogs with comment sections, or e-commerce sites that host product reviews. And the surviving websites would alter their behavior to avoid suffering the same fate.

In that interpretation of the law, Craigslist said in a Supreme Court brief it could be forced to stop letting users browse by geographic region or by categories such as "bikes," "boats" or "books," instead having to provide an "undifferentiated morass of information."

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

How a race for a seat on Wisconsin's Supreme Court could impact the 2024 electionThe election with the highest stakes could be a runoff for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat that could decide the state's future on abortion and voting rights — and any challenges there to the 2024 presidential election.
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »

What to expect as student debt cancellation goes to the Supreme CourtHere’s what borrowers should know about the upcoming oral arguments and why you should still plan for repayment.
Source: TucsonStar - 🏆 339. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court’s pro-gun ruling could mean 150 more firearms deaths a year: RandThe Rand Corporation has put a death toll on last year’s gun-rights Supreme Court ruling, calculating that more permissive concealed-carry permit laws would lead to at least 150 additional firearms deaths each year. And 1,000 more gun owner's lives saved being able to defend themselves and their loved ones. Probably most of the new shootings will be of bad guys since we can now protect ourselves.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Unlikely Alliances In Supreme Court Opinions On Overtime, Death PenaltyThe cases involved who qualifies for overtime pay, and Arizona's refusal to apply a Supreme Court precedent in death penalty jury instructions.
Source: LAist - 🏆 606. / 51 Read more »

State Supreme Court deals another defeat to San Diego Unified's student COVID-19 vaccine mandateThe district's COVID-19 vaccination mandate for students — one of the first enacted around the state in 2021 — has been on pause since spring of last year.
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

‘No Jail Judy’ up for seat on Wisconsin Supreme CourtA man sexually assaults a 15-year-old girl. He gets arrested and convicted of a felony. Instead of sentencing the child rapist to prison time, the judge stays his sentence if he completes five years of probation.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »