), there are approximately 0.0000001 Danielle Citrons, i.e. folks who actually understand it, what it does, and how it might be tweaked or interpreted to do better. Luckily, we have aProfessor Danielle Citron on this week’s show.
Professor Citron not only manages to make sense of Section 230 for us, she also takes us through this week’s internet cases involving Twitter and Google, and content moderation and liability. She explains how eight out of nine justices apparently failed to read the briefs, instead deciding on an “it’s so hard” shruggy head-scratch strategy instead. Danielle Citron’s latest book is
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US Strike Activity Surged in 2022 as SCOTUS Workers' Rights Ruling LoomsThe number of U.S. workers who staged work stoppages in a wide array of industries in 2022 surged by nearly 50% from the previous year, new federal data shows—but the resolve among employees demanding fair pay after years without a raise, better working conditions, and paid sick leave may be under t
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
We Could Soon Open a Pandora’s Box of Impossible Speech LawsExperts say social media platforms could face dozens of unworkable, contradictory speech laws if the Supreme Court upholds Texas's tech censorship law. Doesn’t marge mean Freeze Peach?
Source: Gizmodo - 🏆 556. / 51 Read more »
Appeals court to decide whether Rep. Scott Perry's cellphone was legally seized by Justice DeptA federal appeals court will soon decide whether DOJ investigators probing the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol were legally allowed to seize Pennsylvania Rep. Scott Perry's cellphone last year, and whether they are allowed to access its contents. “if you have nothing to hide? why hide?” I don’t trust anyone in the present Administration. They all Democrats. Calling J6 an “ insurrection” is laughable. J6 has been falsely inflated intentionally, to falsely discredit Trump and his allies. The J6 kangaroo court was a Stalinist show trial solely to prevent Trump from being president again. Nothing to do with 'getting at the truth.' Ron…
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »