The Supreme Court Probably Won’t Break the Internet—At Least for Now

  • 📰 NewYorker
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 67%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases that could change the Internet. “It was difficult to listen to the hearings without getting some sense that big tech companies should be more accountable for their content,” chaykak writes.

. The family of one of the victims, a Jordanian man named Nawras Alassaf, sued Twitter, Google, and Facebook under a recently amended provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act, alleging that they both hosted and recommendedby helping to inspire the attack. “The assistance doesn’t have to be connected to a specific act,” Schnapper, who again represented the plaintiffs, argued.

There’s unusual bipartisan support for increased regulation of tech companies right now, but that doesn’t mean that the Court will challenge Section 230 in these cases. “It seems like there is not a great appetite for the Court to use these facts, in either Gonzalez or Taamneh, as the vehicle for making great changes to the core legal structure of Internet platforms,” Nathaniel Persily, a professor at Stanford Law School, told me.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

chaykak To over regulation rightnow it would be irresponsable.

chaykak This is very true!

chaykak 🤔

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 90. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Candidates in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Include a Trump Loyalist Involved in Fake Electors PlotOne of the two candidates who advanced to the next round of Wisconsin’s state Supreme Court race on Tuesday allegedly sought to help former President Donald Trump overturn the 2020 election results in the state through a fake electors scheme. thatchriswalker Help the other one!
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court seems to favor social media companies in terror caseDuring arguments, several justices underscored that there was no evidence linking Twitter, Facebook and Google directly to the 2017 attack on the Reina nightclub in Istanbul. Nobody cares about this nonsense argument all of them are lies and fake It sounds like the news doesn't know what to write or give us so they give us more bullshit
Source: FOXLA - 🏆 445. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court rules for Arizona inmate in death penalty caseWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday for a man on Arizona's death row who wants a new sentencing hearing because jurors in his case were wrongly told that the only way to ensure he would never walk free was to sentence him to death. شبهه نظامیان عراق چندی پیش مجتمع و مرکز علمی و آموزشی سید احمدالحسن ع را بی دلیل بستن... همیشه عدالت پس از رنج های پیاپی که متحمل می شود، می آید تا سرپرستی‌ انسان را برعهده بگیرد. فتح_المکتب
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court sounds split on whether social media firms can be sued for aiding terroristsSupreme Court justices sounded split over whether social media firms can be sued for aiding terrorists.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court OKs overtime pay for $200,000-a-year oil rig workerThe Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that an energy company employee who earned more than $200,000 a year still qualified for overtime pay under a New Deal-era federal law meant to protect blue-collar workers. Thanks Republicans
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

The Texas Supreme Court argues over who's in control during an emergency - KRLD All LocalPlus, Frisco residents speak out against Universal theme park, and officials nearing decision on HWY 380 bypass.
Source: KRLD - 🏆 75. / 68 Read more »