How the Supreme Court could reshape the internet as you know it

The Supreme Court is hearing a case that could change liability for some of the internet's largest media companies.

His question sought to explore what might really happen in a world where the Court rolls back a 27-year-old liability shield, allowing tech platforms to be sued over how they host and display videos, forum posts, and other user-generated content.

Understanding how the internet may work differently without Section 230 - or if the law is significantly narrowed - starts with one, simple concept: Shrinking the liability shield means exposing websites and internet users to more lawsuits.Virtually all of the potential consequences for the internet, both good and bad, flow from that single idea.

"The massive social media industry has grown up largely shielded from the courts and the normal development of a body of law. It is highly irregular for a global industry that wields staggering influence to be protected from judicial inquiry," wrote the Anti-Defamation League in a Supreme Court brief."Every other industry has to internalize the costs of its conduct," she said. "Why is it that the tech industry gets a pass? A little bit unclear.

The sheer volume of lawsuits could crush website owners or internet users that can't afford to fight court battles on multiple fronts, leading to the kind of business ripple effects Kavanaugh raised. That could include personal blogs with comment sections, or e-commerce sites that host product reviews. And the surviving websites would alter their behavior to avoid suffering the same fate.

In that interpretation of the law, Craigslist said in a Supreme Court brief it could be forced to stop letting users browse by geographic region or by categories such as "bikes," "boats" or "books," instead having to provide an "undifferentiated morass of information."

GOOD. If there has been any wrongdoing, these giants need to be accountable.

NO IT WOULDN'T. HOLD their 'YouTube Creators ' liable for causing suicides and destroying people's lives for no reason except they can and YouTube does nothing even if reported a thousand times

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Justice Department claims Google destroyed written records tied to antitrust suit: reportJustice Department officials on Thursday said Alphabet Inc.’s Google destroyed evidence related to an antitrust lawsuit that looks at how the company... Wouldn't surprise me. Google is corrupt af.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Justice Department Says Google Destroyed Evidence Related to Antitrust LawsuitThe Justice Department said Google destroyed written records needed for an antitrust lawsuit that focuses on how the company preserved its dominance in internet search Google doing something corrupt and shady No way They learned from TFG 👇 Isn’t that a crime?
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

U.S. Justice Dept accuses Google of evidence destruction in antitrust caseU.S. Justice Department lawyers say that Alphabet Inc's Google destroyed internal corporate communications and have asked a federal judge to sanction the company as part of the government's antitrust case over its search business. Don’t worry it’s in the cloud. If you hurt Google, you can forget about US economy. IT WILL TANK!! Google does a lot more good than bad
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »