Supreme Court urged to protect employee rights to religious observance, reverse 1977 ruling

Should the high court rule in favor of Gerald Groff, who quit rather than work on Sunday, the decision would reverse a 46-year-old decision saying employers could be required to provide accommodations only so long as no “undue hardship” was placed on that employer.

The carrier claims he endured “harsh treatment” for his religious beliefs, suffering “two years of progressive discipline, hostile working conditions” and uncertainty over whether he would be terminated any day he showed up for work. He resigned in January 2019 but subsequently sued to get his job back and accommodation for his beliefs.

The Supreme Court, which spurned other appeals related to religious accommodation in employment in recent years, said it would taketo determine if he has backing under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination due to religion, including “all aspects of religious observance and practice” unless that “undue hardship” is created by accommodating the worker.

Mr. Reinach said there had been “a significant increase” in religious accommodation complaints filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission “in the last 20 years, but of course there are many, many people who never complain” and instead find other jobs.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court for first time casts doubt on Section 230, the legal shield for Big TechThe legal shield known as Section 230 launched Big Tech and was largely unchallenged in the Supreme Court — until now. Any attempt to overturn 230 is a violation of the first amendment. Finding for the plaintiff puts all kinds of people at risk. Terrorist rents truck, blows up something: are the builders of the roads he used liable how about the truck manufacturer, or the rental agency?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Big Tech is about to have an epic week in the Supreme CourtThe stakes are high as the Supreme Court takes its first look at a law Republicans and Democrats have both criticized for giving too much protection to the tech industry. good news for YouTube is SusanWojcicki will be eventually gone but bad news is her replacement nealmohan is worse on censorship thanks to sundarpichai The internet gives the common people too much power. They aim to disable it. But there is so much money at stake, I think they will go the cowards way out. I am surprised they didn't vote to ignore it.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Brazil Supreme Court rules Bayer must return $252 million in GMO soy royaltiesGermany's Bayer has been ordered by Brazil's Supreme Court to return to Brazilian soybean farmers the royalties they were charged for a GMO soybean seed, the Mato Grosso farmer lobby Aprosoja-MT said in a statement on Friday. it is an agreement between parties, nothing to do with Brazil.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Student Loan Borrowers to Rally 'In Full Force' as Supreme Court Weighs Biden Relief Plan'Working people are looking to SCOTUS to follow the letter of the law and uphold critical relief for millions of student loan borrowers,' say organizers of the People's Rally for Student Debt Cancellation. Keep staying gullible, Democrats. First you bought the lie that Biden could and would cancel your debts, and now you're buying the lie that SCOTUS and Republicans are to blame for Biden acting in a lawless, unconstitutional manner.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs protecting big tech with liability shield for dangerous contentA lawsuit against YouTube from the family of an American college student who was killed by Islamic State gunmen in Paris in 2015 is at the center of a closely watched Supreme Court case being argued Tuesday.
Source: fox5ny - 🏆 587. / 51 Read more »