, which protects tech companies from being sued over material put on their sites by users. The second is the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which allows Americans injured by a terrorist attack abroad to sue for money damages in federal court.
In Wednesday’s case, the family of a man killed in the Reina nightclub attack in Istanbul sued Twitter, Facebook and YouTube parent Google under the terrorism law. Nawras Alassaf’s family members, who are U.S. citizens, say the companies aided and abetted the attack because they assisted in the growth of the Islamic State group, which claimed responsibility for the attack. A lower court let the lawsuit go forward.
The platforms argue that they can’t be sued because they did not knowingly or substantially assist in the Reina attack. If the justices agree, they don’t have to reach bigger questions about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and whether it protects platforms when they recommend content. The broader questions about Section 230 were at the center of the case the justices heard Tuesday. In that case, the family of an American college student who was one of 130 people killed in the Paris attacks sued under the terrorism law.argued that the Islamic State group used YouTube to spread its message and recruit people to its cause. They said YouTube’s algorithm, which recommends videos to users based on their viewing habits, was critical to the Islamic State group’s growth.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Primary to set field for Wisconsin Supreme Court election on TuesdayThe field of four candidates running for a pivotal Wisconsin Supreme Court seat will be cut in half after Tuesday’s primary, with the top two vote-getters advancing to an April 4 general election in the presidential battleground state.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »
Protasiewicz, Kelly advance in Wisconsin high court primaryA liberal Milwaukee judge and a conservative former state Supreme Court justice have won Tuesday’s primary to face off in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race that will determine majority control
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court justices weigh liability protections for online contentThe Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark tech case, Gonzalez v. Google, grappling for the first time with whether to make big changes in a 1996 law protecting service providers and publishers from being sued over content their users post. This is gonna kill fox 'news'. They could be responsible for the stories they post. if conservatives thought censorship was bad before this law is repealed, just wait till after 😂😂 The solution is simple SCOTUS: IF they can't be sued then why should they care what we say...and Users need to grow up...it has an off-switch....promote entrepreneurship, start your own twitter...
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Los Gatos High students banned from Tuesday playoff game for storming court earlier this monthAs punishment for storming the court on Feb. 10, Los Gatos High students can’t attend their home playoff game against Salinas.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
A Supreme Court Case About ISIS and YouTube Could Change the Internet as We Know ItThis case has garnered far less attention than Gonzalez v. Google, but could be just as consequential.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »