The Supreme Court appeared resistant on Tuesday to limiting the scope of a federal law that has served as a
At several points, liberal and conservative justices alike expressed confusion with the arguments raised by counsel Eric Schnapper, who was arguing on behalf of the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, an American college student who was among the 129 people killed in Paris by ISIS terrorists in November 2015.
Others contended that the Supreme Court may not be the best venue for weighing the future of Section 230 and its protections, as it risked undermining efforts by Congress to shield internet companies when it drafted the law in 1996. The two justices also expressed concerns that a ruling in favor of the Gonzalez family limiting the reach of Section 230 could open the door to a flood of litigation.
"Helping users find the proverbial needle in the haystack is an existential necessity on the internet," she said.
These people have their hands out. So pathetic.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Wisconsin Supreme Court race holds high stakes for abortion rights and the 2024 electionThe Wisconsin Supreme Court could become the final arbiter on an array of consequential issues, including the fate of the state's prohibition on abortion
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giantsThe tech industry is facing criticism from the left for not doing enough to remove harmful content from the internet and from the right for censoring conservative speech.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »
Opinion | The political world focuses on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court raceOpinion by Jennifer Rubin: If a progressive wins the seat, the court will likely defend abortion rights in a state where a significant majority of voters are pro-choice. My vote is for someone in between - We need reasonable pro-choice legislation. Abortion until 20 weeks then after that it should be only in medical emergencies. No pensions joe , go back to wherever cane from I think it’s a rock on the beach
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giantsA lawsuit against YouTube from the family of an American college student who was killed by Islamic State gunmen in Paris in 2015 is at the center of a closely watched Supreme Court case being argued Tuesday.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giantsThe high court is taking its first hard look at online legal protections as the industry faces criticism for not doing enough to remove harmful content and for censoring conservative speech.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Supreme Court hears a case that could transform the internetOral arguments begin in Gonzalez v. Google, a landmark case tackling whether tech companies should be liable for harmful content their algorithms surface. I want to know when big tech will be held criminally responsible for censoring free speech like the Twitter Files showed they did And I still want to know why the left supported that censorship Wait til the originalists on the court start asking questions about how Madison et al felt about the internet. [Other Topic FINRAFRAUD] Quoting: MikeJam94602689 Greatest fraud story of our decade perpetrated by a self regulatory agency finra against 65k investors in $mmtlp, the SECGov won’t even respond to calls from everyday Americans who have had their retirement accounts stolen
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »