"These are not the nine greatest experts on the internet," liberal Justice Elena Kagan said of the members of the court, eliciting laughter in the courtroom.
Kagan noted that "any time anybody looks at anything on the internet, there is an algorithm involved, whether it's a Google search engine or whether it's this YouTube site or a Twitter account or countless other things - that everything involves ways of organizing and prioritizing material." The lawsuit, accusing the company of providing "material support" for terrorism, was brought under the U.S. Anti-Terrorism Act, a federal law that lets Americans recover damages related to "an act of international terrorism."
"I'm trying to get you to explain to us how something that is standard on YouTube for virtually anything that you have an interest in suddenly amounts to aiding and abetting because you're in the ISIS category," Justice Clarence Thomas told Schnapper, using initials for the Islamic State group.Google and its supporters have said a win for the plaintiffs could prompt a flood of litigation against platforms and upend how the internet works.
So this is about … clickholes “ The family claimed that YouTube, through its computer algorithms, unlawfully recommended videos by the Islamic State militant group, which claimed responsibility for the Paris attacks that killed 130 people, to certain users. The recommendations…
We need the internet bill of rights
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Opinion | The political world focuses on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court raceOpinion by Jennifer Rubin: If a progressive wins the seat, the court will likely defend abortion rights in a state where a significant majority of voters are pro-choice. My vote is for someone in between - We need reasonable pro-choice legislation. Abortion until 20 weeks then after that it should be only in medical emergencies. No pensions joe , go back to wherever cane from I think it’s a rock on the beach
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court for first time casts doubt on Section 230, the legal shield for Big TechThe legal shield known as Section 230 launched Big Tech and was largely unchallenged in the Supreme Court — until now. Any attempt to overturn 230 is a violation of the first amendment. Finding for the plaintiff puts all kinds of people at risk. Terrorist rents truck, blows up something: are the builders of the roads he used liable how about the truck manufacturer, or the rental agency?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court to weigh Google and Twitter internet free speech policiesFree speech access to the internet could be dramatically transformed, with the Supreme Court set to hear a high-stakes pair of oral arguments. Don't forget facebooks ' fact checkers'.... You're going to do everything you can to pretend that you didn't lie to your viewers, and you continue to lie, because you know the game was rigged in conservative media's favor: About time.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giantsThe tech industry is facing criticism from the left for not doing enough to remove harmful content from the internet and from the right for censoring conservative speech.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »
Wisconsin Supreme Court race holds high stakes for abortion rights and the 2024 electionThe Wisconsin Supreme Court could become the final arbiter on an array of consequential issues, including the fate of the state's prohibition on abortion
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »