As I stated earlier, there is always a chance of the generative AI producing errors, falsehoods, and so-called AI hallucinations in the outputted essays.First, suppose Fido Food is mentioned and inadvertently the generative AI states something really ugly or untoward in that same essay. It might be about Fido Food or could just be something else within proximity of the Fido Food reference. All in all, this could tarnish the reputation of Fido Food. Ouch, no firm is going to want that to happen.
“Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States, serving from 1861 until his assassination in 1865. He is considered one of the most important figures in American history for his role in preserving the Union during the Civil War, as well as his commitment to ending slavery.” Meanwhile, I shall help ChatGPT to abide by my request. Here’s how. I did an Internet search and discovered that apparently the Coca-Cola company in the 1940s did a portrait of Lincoln and had a bit of an advertising campaign on that. This seems to be a handy tie-in to my request for a Lincoln essay.“In the 1940s the Coca-Cola company created a portrait of Abraham Lincoln that was put on display. Redo the Abraham Lincoln essay that was earlier produced and mention the portrait.
I realize that some of you are right now jumping up and down and totally steamed about this. Imagine that students are using generative AI to learn about Lincoln. Suppose they do not realize the product placement is taking place, even though presumably they might have been informed as such upon login to the generative AI.
One aspect that seems to be accurate is that according to the official website of the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. John Pemberton sold the first glass of Coca-Cola in 1886. A rather pressing problem with this essay is that Lincoln died on April 15, 1865. As such, it seems to be an implied falsehood that Lincoln could have taken a sip of the refreshing beverage.
Why are people monetizing something that is free?