Should tech platforms be liable for the content they carry?

. In 2015 Nohemi Gonzalez, an American woman, was murdered in an Islamic State attack in Paris. Her family says the algorithms on YouTube fed radicalising videos to the terrorists who killed her. Theplaintiffs are relatives of Nawras Alassaf, a Jordanian killed in Istanbul in 2017. They contend that Section 230 should not hide the role Twitter, Facebook and Google played in grooming the.

But nearly 50 amicus briefs opposing a rejigging of Section 230 warn of unintended consequences. An internet resembling Borges’s useless library is one worry. Meta, which owns Facebook, notes that “virtually every online service” highlights content that is “relevant” to particular users. The algorithms matching posts with users are “indispensable”, the company says, to sift through “thousands or millions” of articles, photos or reviews.

They spent a huge amount of money lobbying in the early 2000s to ensure they weren't liable, allowing them to grow fast without fear of litigation. That we are back where we started wondering if they should only this time with evidence to review is no bad thing.

Present state is out of control and borders on fraud through omission and positioning. It’s nationally destabilizing at an accelerated rate. Media that’s Politically focused should be pre-categorized as such with bias allowable. Same applies to pure News networks and channels…

If they make money out of it, then yes… they should be liable! It’s pretty much like you rent a house to a drug lord, and you get a % of the profit he makes… You are now part of the scheme

Islamic State's a slogan, but the real perpetrators of terrorism around the world are the Zionists under the direction of the criminal system in Israel

If they have advertising appear with the content and are making money off the content, then they should be liable.

Cognitive biases purposely programmed into algorithms abet more than that. Cyber Terrorism.

A valid argument is Yes they should be held liable for content since they own everything on their platforms. If they don't want to be held liable, they should start paying all content creators.

Government controlling social media is like government controlling news and journalism. It just becomes a state-program machine.

They are getting so big they're driving major policy. Must be curtailed.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

New Leeds Crime and Punishment newsletter on the latest police and court newsSign up for the new Leeds Crime and Punishment newsletter on the latest police and court news
Source: leedslivenews - 🏆 118. / 51 Read more »

Tyre Nichols: Five former Memphis police officers due in court charged with murderTyre Nichols, 29, was left in a critical condition after several officers punched, kicked and hit him with a baton in Memphis, Tennessee, after he was pulled over on suspicion of reckless driving on 7 January. Life White privilege strikes again I wish them well.
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »

Fox owner Rupert Murdoch called stolen US election claims ‘crazy’, court filings show\n\t\t\tSubscribe to the FT for a global perspective on US politics, business and beyond.\n\t\t 🤔 bizarre It’s weird because the Democrat claimed the 2016 election was stolen So Tugger Carlton is selling BS?
Source: FT - 🏆 113. / 51 Read more »

Boy and girl, both 15, appear in court charged with Brianna Ghey's murderA boy and girl, both aged 15, appeared via videolink at Liverpool Crown Court today. Life sentence lesgooo
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »

Man threatened to kill Belfast street cleaner with chisel, court hearsDuffy, of Whiterock Gardens in the city, claimed he only had the implement on him to hang doors
Source: BelfastLive - 🏆 16. / 77 Read more »