Musk spent roughly three more hours on the stand during his third day of testimony before being excused by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen. It's unlikely Musk, 51, will be summoned back to the witness stand during a civil trial expected to be turned over to a nine-person jury in early February.
When he was being challenged by Porritt, Musk purposefully diverted his gaze from the lawyer and delivered his explanations while looking directly at the jurors sitting a few feet to his right. In another instance, Musk asserted, without elaborating, that a question from Porritt wondering if he had ever caused investors to suffered losses contained “falsehoods.”
In the first of the 2018 tweets, Musk stated “funding secured” for what would have been a $72 billion - or $420 per share - buyout of Tesla at a time when the electric automaker was still grappling with production problems and was worth far less than it is now. Musk followed up a few hours later with another tweet suggesting a deal was imminent.
Musk spent most of Tuesday trying to persuade the jurors that there was nothing devious about the two tweets indicating he had lined up the money to take Tesla private as the electric automaker was struggling with production problems and was worth far less than it is now. The judge has already declared the jurors can consider those two tweets to be false, leaving them to decide whether Musk deliberately deceived investors and whether his statements saddled them with losses.
Not long after Porritt resumed his questioning Tuesday, Musk once again scoffed at the notion that his belief that he had the Saudi funding's financial backing wasn't enough for him to tweet about a potential Tesla buyout.
Don't buy his cars
Go Elon go! Our modern day Edison.
He should defend himself strongly. If people crash their investments due to a tweet, they shouldn't be investing. Who's to say that Elon's account wasn't hacked and the initial words were nit his?
You sure that's elonmusk? 😂
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: calgarysun - 🏆 63. / 52 Read more »
Source: OttawaCitizen - 🏆 21. / 68 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: BNNBloomberg - 🏆 83. / 50 Read more »
Source: TheTorontoSun - 🏆 23. / 68 Read more »
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »