Judge brushes off house painter’s one-star Google review

  • 📰 smh
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 44 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 80%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Business owner can’t sue over one-star Google review, judge rules

In most states and territories, a person can only sue for defamation if they prove a publication “caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm” to their reputation.

The case was among the first in Australia to test the serious harm provision, which is now law in most parts of the country. The posts, which were online between March 16 and March 31 last year, were deleted after the former customer received a legal letter., which started in NSW, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and the ACT in July 2021 and in Tasmania in November that year, a plaintiff must show the publication of “defamatory matter” about them “has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm” to their reputation. Failing to prove serious harm results in the case being dismissed.

The serious harm test, modelled on British law, was among “a series of reforms intended to encourage parties to seek alternative ways to resolve claims where the damages are likely to be modest and out of proportion to the cost of proceedings”, Judge Gibson said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines