Nanaimo man faces five-year wait for pardon over fines he didn't know he had

  • 📰 PGCitizen
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Robin McCaghren says he only discovered he had two unpaid $100 fines for failing to attend court and failing to appear in 1997 and 1998 when he got a criminal record check.

A Nanaimo man believes that a decades-old clerical court error is the reason he can’t apply for a pardon for five years.

“When I began this process in October, I didn’t know those fines existed,” McCaghren said Wednesday. “I believed from the start that I’m in the clear and my criminal record was behind me. I thought it was all dealt with. I think this must be a clerical error in the court system.” After completion, the person must wait a set number of years — based on the date when they committed their first offence — before applying for a record suspension.“It’s ironic. The whole mandate of the Parole Board of Canada is to put people on the straight and narrow and have them become contributing members of society,” he said. “And I am very far removed from the kid I was living on the street.

“I was never involved in the break-in,” said McCaghren, who did time, was fined and put on probation.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 65. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Nanaimo man faces five-year wait for pardon over fines he didn't know he hadRobin McCaghren says he only discovered he had two unpaid $100 fines for failing to attend court and failing to appear in 1997 and 1998 when he got a criminal record check. I have another suggestion. Those are summary convictions at best. If FedEx wants to fuck around file a human rights complaint. They don't stand a chance. My question is, how does he not know this as an adult? Feel free to suggest I am wrong. I know it's not always cool to litigate. However, FedEx has to follow the same rules as everyone else. In this circumstance, FedEx can't even consider these convictions whether they are clerical or not.Go check the law. Now, equality for everyone! FedEx you have this situation here you should correct. You are in violation of the 'refusal to hire' clause on our Human rights legislation. Before he gets a lawyer you should correct it, call him up and give him the job you offered. That's corporate responsibility!
Source: timescolonist - 🏆 15. / 75 Read more »