the unauthorized disclosure, calling it a"betrayal of the confidences of the court." The Supreme Court revealed Thursday that it also consulted Michael Chertoff, former secretary of Homeland Security, to assess the marshal's probe.
In a report from the marshal accompanying the Supreme Court's statement about the investigation, Curley said it is"unlikely" the leak stemmed from a hack of the court's IT systems by a person outside the court. But after examining the Supreme Court's computer devices, networks, printers and available call and text logs, investigators found"no forensic evidence indicating who disclosed the draft opinion.
Curley's investigative team consisted of attorneys and federal investigators with experience in criminal, administrative and cyber investigations, and they conducted 126 formal interviews of 97 employees, who all denied leaking the opinion, according to her report. "Investigators continue to review and process some electronic data that has been collected and a few other inquiries remain pending. To the extent that additional investigation yields new evidence or leads, the investigators will pursue them," Curley said in her report."If a Court employee disclosed the draft opinion, that person brazenly violated a system that was built fundamentally on trust with limited safeguards to regulate and constrain access to very sensitive information.
She lamented that the COVID-19 pandemic, which eased the ability to work from home, and gaps in the Supreme Court's security policies, created an environment that made it easy to remove"sensitive information" from the building and the court's IT networks, raising the risk of"deliberate and accidental disclosures of court-sensitive information."
Should’ve used FBI This is a long lasting scar!
Starts with an A ends with a Lito
bc it was Alito
NorahODonnell one of the justices probably leaked it and use the hourly's as red herrings.
cbschicago And this is surprising how?
BULLSHIT.
Can’t Or won’t identify the Supreme Court leaker?
NorahODonnell Hahahahahaha sure sure
Because they didn't want to throw Soto Mayor's Office staff under the bus.
That’s a lie.
Unable or unwilling? Must be one of Ginni’s besties.
ProChoice.... abortion, pot, vaxxes, pot....if you don't want one don't get one. These are all issues where the real issue is minding your own damn business.
wdefnews12 Politico rubs it in...
Lol, so what is going to do or have done as “journalism” to find out. Or since it’s against the state narrative….nothing
I call bullshit!
Dear Supreme Court 🤣😂🤣 whatever.
Gee, I wonder why the investigators didn't question the Justices or the clerks? It's as if they really didn't want to find the culprit.
They say unable to, the truth is unwilling to.
There are always ways to find out
Right!!!
'unable' As in, we do not know, or we are unwilling to do so for political reasons.
LOL...like anyone actually believes this. Should be 'The Supreme Court says it won't identify the person who leaked the draft....'
'we've investigated ourselves and found that we did no wrong'
And so the cartel of liars live on.
😂
Ridiculous
I call bullshit!
Unwilling. Hiding behind her husband.
Put the FBI & DOJ on it...they will come up with Trump or another fall-guy Republican.. .works every time!
I'm unable to identify most members of the Supreme Court. For me, the court has become unrecognizable. scary
Just a huge coverup
Pathetic
SCOTUS knows who leaked just don't wanna make it public
Yeah, I’m not believing that
Hey SCOTUS
Sure
😂😂☝
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »
Source: sltrib - 🏆 316. / 61 Read more »
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »