The lawyer did however tell the jury that Musk's Twitter post contained some"technical inaccuracies".Littleton, giving his testimony to the court, said he had invested in Tesla in 2015.
He said after seeing Musk's"funding secured" post he had scrambled to unwind his Tesla options positions, which the tweet made unprofitable. A jury of nine will decide whether Musk's tweets artificially inflated Tesla's share price by playing up the status of funding for the deal, and if so, by how much.The judge, Edward Chen, denied a request by Musk to have the case moved to Texas last week, with the billionaire expressing concern that potential jurors in California would be biased against him.
Twitter should have been held to account for allowing lies to be published on their platform.
Musk is one very weird individual, he, maybe, has a technical super brain, but he mentally/socially/emotionally operates in a very confused way, to fulfill his different view/expectation of life.
A PM lying on Twitter is OK though?
The left really are pissed off ain’t they.
oh so you have not heard about this then- js
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Source: BBCTech - 🏆 81. / 55 Read more »
Elon Musk made ‘split-second’ decision on Tesla tweet after FT story, lawyer says\n\t\t\tKeep abreast of significant corporate, financial and political developments around the world.\n\t\t\tStay informed and spot emerging risks and opportunities with independent global reporting, expert\n\t\t\tcommentary and analysis you can trust.\n\t\t 'I impulsively tweet stupid and harmful shit like a middle-schooler' is a proper defense? Though, I guess it can, as it seems to work for Trump. Prisons are full of people who made split second decisions
Source: FT - 🏆 113. / 51 Read more »