Deaf student's lawsuit at center of Supreme Court case

FILE - The U.S. Supreme Court is seen at near sunset in Washington, on Oct. 18, 2018. The Supreme Court will hear a case Jan. 18, 2023, that could make it more difficult for students with disabilities to quickly resolve problems when they're not getting needed assistance in public schools. The question for the justices involves a federal law that guarantees disabled students an education specific to their needs.

FILE - The U.S. Supreme Court is seen at near sunset in Washington, on Oct. 18, 2018. The Supreme Court will hear a case Jan. 18, 2023, that could make it more difficult for students with disabilities to quickly resolve problems when they're not getting needed assistance in public schools. The question for the justices involves a federal law that guarantees disabled students an education specific to their needs.

The question for the justices involves a federal law that guarantees disabled students an education specific to their needs. Lawyers for Miguel Luna Perez, a deaf student who attended public school in Sturgis, Michigan, said that for more than a decade the school system failed to provide him with a qualified sign language interpreter and misled his parents into believing he was on track to earn his high school diploma. Just before graduation, however, his family was told he qualified only for a “certificate of completion,” not a diploma.

His family responded by pursuing claims under two laws, the broad Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination against disabled people, and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The IDEA guarantees children with disabilities a free public education that is tailored to their specific needs.Perez’s family and the school district ultimately settled the IDEA claims.

xtreme court, not supreme..interfering with ppl with disabilities. smh

Why does anybody want to harm these students with disabilities?

it's astounding how the Supreme Court is now all about how to make life more and more difficult for American citizens, particularly not white old rich men.

Conservatives licking their chops to fuck over the shriner kids.

Nazis targeted people with disabilities, too 🤷

There was another political party back in the 1930s that did everything it could to persecute and disenfranchise ethnic and religious minorities, gays, immigrants, and disabled people. Can't remember which country they were based out of, though. Somebody help me out here.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Washington state supreme court court OK's Albertsons' merger $4B dividendThe Washington state Supreme Court has brushed aside the final remaining legal hurdle in the way of a $4 billion dividend by Albertsons to its shareholders ahead of a proposed merger with grocery rival Kroger. Leron518 Article doesn’t mention that the owner and recipient of the $4 bil is private equity firm Cerberus…
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court's Alito and Thomas warn new gun control law raises 'serious' 2A questionsTwo of the Supreme Court's most conservative justices warned this week that New York's concealed carry restrictions law raises 'serious' constitutional questions ahead of arguments in four Second Amendment-related challenges at the federal appeals court level. This means challenge it now, win the case! Do it Republicans, stand up for the US Constitution TracieJames777 There's an army on the dance floor It's a fashion with a gun, my love In a room without a door A kiss is not enough in Love my way, it's a new road I follow where my mind goes They'd put us on a railroad They'd dearly make us pay For laughing in their faces And making it our way
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Missouri challenge to tax cut rule in COVID aid packageThe Supreme Court turned away a legal battle brought by the state of Missouri over a measure in the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 aid package that prohibited states from using economic relief money awarded to them to offset tax cuts. Wow. They did something smart You are non worthy news organization. A useless tool If you misuse COVID funds you must return! Sure republicans are looking for reason to defraud government but Yellen should continue to fight for retrieval of funds!
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects appeal on use of COVID aid for tax cutsWASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court turned away a Missouri appeal that sought to ensure states can cut taxes even as they receive $195 billion in federal pandemic relief money.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs criminal charges against Turkish bank over violations of Iranian sanctionsA Turkish bank accused of flouting U.S. sanctions against Iran argued Tuesday before the Supreme Court that it is shielded from American legal challenges because it is operated by a foreign sovereign. Seize all of their US Assets
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court mulls Turkish lender Halkbank's bid to avoid chargesU.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday grappled with thorny questions of sovereign immunity as they weighed a bid by Turkey's state-owned lender Halkbank to avoid criminal charges in the United States for allegedly helping Iran evade American economic sanctions.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »