Trump-era bump stocks ban struck down by federal court

  • 📰 axios
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 36 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A federal appeals court struck down a ban on bump stocks — a device that can be attached to a semiautomatic firearm enabling it to rapidly fire bullets.

ban was instated following a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, where a gunman killed dozens of people and injured hundreds of others from his hotel room using weapons equipped with bump stocks.Those against the ban argued that bump stocks do not fall under the definition of illegal machine guns in federal law.

But the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives says they do, a position the Biden administration agrees on, per AP."A plain reading of the statutory language, paired with close consideration of the mechanics of a semi-automatic firearm, reveals that a bump stock is excluded from the technical definition of ‘machinegun’ set forth in the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act," Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod wrote in the opinion.

The definition of "machine gun" does not apply to bump stocks, the opinion goes on to say. "And if there were any doubt as to this conclusion, we conclude that the statutory definition is ambiguous, at the very least."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I’ll be ordering up some. Great news.

I remember Trump supporters at the time saying he did this so it could eventually get thrown out in court. Obvious nonsense but luckily here we are.

This is very sad, especially for progress in America.

This was a political terrorist attack at best to get guns banned or a criminal nut job with a lot of money and ignorant hotel staff at worst,sadly we may never know since nothing has been released but the lack of info usually means they don't want you to know

NB: this was a judge in the *FIFTH CIRCUIT* (please nobody be surprised) Likewise, the majority opinion was written by a Federalist Society judge appointed by Dubya. (also no surprise) SCOTUS has bee rejecting bumpstock appeals, but one hopes they'll take this one.

And if the Vagas shooter had any knowledge he would know not to use this is a gimmick part,you can't really aim the firearm and you spend the whole time focusing on getting it to fire,that shooting could have been worse if he knew anything about firearms

The logic is just not evident

Good!

2nd amendment is 2nd amendment.

Our constitution wants to kill us

MaxNordau has team MAGA seen this yet?

I just had a car with 22 inch rims and near bald tires drive by me on the highway doing at least 80 . . . . . . so you're saying dangerous modifications like this should illegal?

America's success is closely linked to how many victims one person can murder in 30 seconds.

Cool the ATF doesn't have the power to define plastic as a machine gun.

Magical “bump stocks” 🤡🤡🤡

I guess they understand what shall not be infringed means!

Uh, the trigger still has to be pulled each time.

Drugs, Guns and un-useful social media are what will take down our most valuable asset - our children … the future of our country. They have the power and their money blinds our law makers and enforcers.

It was always an unconstitutional ban. Glad it's gone.

the feds killed 50+ people in las vegas for nothing

Cool. It was unconstitutional.

What's next? A phone app that will fire for you? You know, like line up 15 AR's pointing out a window, sit back in the recliner, paaarrrtay. SMH 🤬

Ugh. This gun crazy country of ours

Conservatives are trying to depopulate the earth.

Of course it was the 5th circuit court of appeals packed to the hilt with Trump appointees.

Why ? Just because someone made them to sell ?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 302. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

South Carolina abortion ban violates state's constitution, state Supreme Court rulesThe South Carolina Supreme Court struck down Thursday a ban on abortion after cardiac activity is detected — typically around six weeks — ruling the restriction violates the state constitution's right to privacy. I wonder when all Americans will view women as fully formed humans with civil rights? Kill them babies. It's the only thing democrats really love.... From the South Carolina Supreme Court majority decision: “Indeed, the only thing remotely breathtaking about our approach is its adherence to precedent.” Take note, SCOTUS
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

The Conservative Who Wants to Bring Down the Supreme CourtThe lawyer behind Texas’s abortion ban says he’s primarily concerned with pushing back against the Supreme Court’s power. Could liberals use his ideas, too? I don’t know if this is ironic anymore or not, but, could we overturn Plessy v. Ferguson next? Yes, why not? Why have they not tried all ready? Qp. x
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court sets March timeline for oral arguments in cash bail appealAn appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of a state law that would end cash bail appears to be at least three months away from resolution under a new timeline approved by the court Thursday.
Source: dailyherald - 🏆 317. / 59 Read more »

South Carolina Supreme Court rules fetal heartbeat law 'unconstitutional'The South Carolina state Supreme Court found that a fetal heartbeat law banning abortions after six weeks of pregnancy violated privacy rights in the state constitution. This is BS!!! What if one of the parents gives the fetus (which is a baby) a name? May God have mercy. Bless all the babies who will die.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

'A Win for Freedom': South Carolina Supreme Court Permanently Blocks Abortion Ban'These radical bans have wreaked havoc across the South and Midwest, but today's decision means that the right to make deeply personal healthcare decisions will remain protected in South Carolina,' said one advocate.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

South Carolina Supreme Court strikes down state abortion banThe South Carolina Supreme Court has struck down a ban on abortion after cardiac activity is detected — typically around six weeks
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »