Trump-era ban on bump stocks struck down by court

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 94%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A Trump-era ban on bump stocks, devices that enable semi-automatic weapons to fire multiple rounds quickly, was nixed by a federal appeals court in New Orleans on Friday.

The ban was imposed after the deadly 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting that killed dozens under the premise that bump stocks convert semi-automatic weapons into machine guns, which are forbidden under federal law. However, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded bump stocks are not covered under the machine gun laws, likely setting the stage for a Supreme Court challenge.

Prior courts, including the 6th Circuit in Cincinnati, the federal circuit court in Washington, and the 10th Circuit in Denver, declined to scrap the ban, the Associated Press reported. At one point, a panel of three judges on the 5th Circuit declined to nix it, but the full court opted to reevaluate that decision last year and heard arguments in September.

In 2017, 58 people were killed in the Las Vegas shooting by a shooter who used a bump stock to fire roughly 1,000 rounds of ammunition. The 5th Circuit noted that the ban came under emotionally charged circumstances in the aftermath of that massacre, but it ultimately concluded that the trigger functions multiple times with a bump stock, thereby not converting semi-automatic weapons into machine guns.

“You only have to do one thing,” Justice Department lawyer Mark Stern told the court, according to the Associated Press. “Your trigger finger isn’t doing anything other than sitting still.”Michael Cargill, a guns rights activist who was the plaintiff in the case, cheered the news of the court's decision.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Good. Let's hope the courts strike down ALL the anti-gun BS rules.

The paradox: ammunition is so expensive now, burning 30 rounds quickly just isn't economically viable. 😛

Who cares, they're junk and waste ammunition....

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines