alleged that, although the HFPA is a tax-exempt organization, it acted like a private club and a cartel, barring qualified applicants who might compete with existing members and severely hampering their professional opportunities.
Federal Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. rejected Flaa’s arguments, citing in part her work covering the entertainment industry over the past several years, including earning recognition for her work with a 2018 citation from the SoCal Journalism Awards Contest in 2018 for a profile of Jane Fonda.to clarify its antitrust claims against the organization, “in part because the allegations in the complaint are so vague and difficult to comprehend from an antitrust perspective.
The amended suit included Spanish journalist Rosa Gamazo Robbins, and challenged the HFPA’s membership policies, claiming they violated federal and state antitrust laws, California’s right of fair procedure and conflicted with organizations tax-exempt status. However, the appeals court judges did not find evidence to support claims that the HFPA’s admissions practices were anticompetitive or unlawful.
“We are grateful for the decision made by the 9th Circuit in affirming the earlier lower court ruling to toss out these spurious claims,” HFPA President Helen Hoehne said in a statement. “While we are focused on the upcoming Globes, on behalf of the organization and the members, we are happy to put this episode behind us.”“I’m still happy that I fought the good fight against corruption and I hope good change will come with it,” Flaa said.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: petapixel - 🏆 527. / 51 Read more »