Majority of Supreme Court gives right-wing election law argument a skeptical hearing

  • 📰 WOKVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday toward arguments that state legislatures should be unbound by state constitutions in how they run elections.

Four different attorneys argued on the matter of Moore v. Harper, a dispute between the North Carolina Legislature and the state Supreme Court, over maps for congressional seats that were redrawn last year to reflect new census data.

But lawyers for the North Carolina Legislature have made an audacious claim in their arguments — that the state courtsin constraining the legislature when it comes to election law. This has become known as the Independent State Legislature Theory. Kagan noted that if the court were to rule in favor of the legislature, it would mean there would be little to stop partisan actors from drawing “extreme” gerrymandered maps that favored their party. She also argued that such a ruling could allow state legislatures to obstruct or restrict voting without much recourse for voters, and that legislatures might even “insert themselves into the certification of elections ... and the way election results are calculated.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Right-wing or upholding the constitution wing? Why do you have to label everyone?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 247. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Hayes: Supreme Court conservative majority is ‘high council of Fox News viewers’“Because the conservative majority has tossed away all pretense of being anything other than, essentially, a high council of Fox News viewers, they decided her case should be heard before the Supreme Court,” says Chris Hayes on the Colorado web designer case. Coming from a pundit that gets little to no coverage. It screams jealousy of his competition FOX news. Bless his little heart. NEW: Federal Judge OKs Oregon's New High-Capacity Magazine Ban Yup!
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Wednesday in ‘Most Important Case’ on DemocracyJoseph Morris, a law firm partner at Morris & De La Rosa, and Carolyn Shapiro, associate dean and professor of law at Illinois Tech Chicago-Kent College of Law join 'Chicago Tonight' to discuss the Supreme Court's new elections case.
Source: wttw - 🏆 520. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court justices spar in latest clash of religion and LGBTQ+ rights in ColoradoThe Supreme Court's conservative majority is sounding sympathetic to a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples. Homosexuals need to learn how to bake. Christina. Who is she?
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court justices spar in latest clash of religion and LGBTQ+ rights in ColoradoThe Supreme Court's conservative majority is sounding sympathetic to a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples.
Source: ABC7NY - 🏆 592. / 51 Read more »